Santhosh was kind enough to send his 45 Kenrad tubes for me to check out how it sounds on my system.
Since a few people wanted to know how the 45 sounds in my amp, i decided to start this thread.
To my ears the 2A3 in my system sounds superior. The 2A3 sounds more musical and is richer sounding. There is a certain emotional connect. While the 45s sounded a wee bit more extended on the extremes, the mids were sounding dry.
In terms of detail retrieval, both were pretty much at the same level. Staging was the same.
When it came to dynamics, i preferred the 2A3. This was probably because of the higher output. On a more efficient system, this might get neutralised.
These differences apart, the 2A3 seemed to play the music as a whole whereas the 45 seemed to play it as parts. That's probably the best way i could describe the performance of the 2 tubes
But again these things are very system dependent. So i would suggest go by what sounds good in your system.
Since a few people wanted to know how the 45 sounds in my amp, i decided to start this thread.
To my ears the 2A3 in my system sounds superior. The 2A3 sounds more musical and is richer sounding. There is a certain emotional connect. While the 45s sounded a wee bit more extended on the extremes, the mids were sounding dry.
In terms of detail retrieval, both were pretty much at the same level. Staging was the same.
When it came to dynamics, i preferred the 2A3. This was probably because of the higher output. On a more efficient system, this might get neutralised.
These differences apart, the 2A3 seemed to play the music as a whole whereas the 45 seemed to play it as parts. That's probably the best way i could describe the performance of the 2 tubes
But again these things are very system dependent. So i would suggest go by what sounds good in your system.