arunvenkats
Member
After I finished the 3" Oblate spheroid full range speakers [https://www.hifivision.com/threads/oblate-spheroid-3d-printed-near-field-speaker.97826], realised that it lacked bass. As expected though, they are tiny 3" full range drivers. Decided to add some bass to the setup. Ordered a Peerless SLS-85S25CP04-04 3-1/2″ Paper Cone Woofer and built a 3D printed ported enclosure for it. The results were far better than what I expected for a 3D printed woofer enclosure. Matches perfectly with the full range speakers. I am driving it through a cheap 2.1 amplifier and more than happy with the outcome for casual, background music for work. Love the sweet, smooth bass at low volumes.
![IMG_6728.jpeg IMG_6728.jpeg](https://www.hifivision.com/data/attachments/76/76122-f59c7a852607dc61a4115fa7af4cbd91.jpg?hash=9HdUTeuxfm)
Don't laugh at the shape! It is a design where pure function-over-form was chosen. The sphere is the smallest surface area for a given volume. This means it uses less material and finishes printing faster. It took a day and 6 hours to print this. The port tube is a square cross section and placed 45° rotated to make sure there are no supports which need to be printed. It would be impossible to remove 3D printing supports from within the tube...
Designing a port which can be 3D printed without supports was tricky but a worthy experience
![IMG_6722.jpeg IMG_6722.jpeg](https://www.hifivision.com/data/attachments/76/76123-51b60718532dc346210dc5b86b97cf06.jpg?hash=XzW15QtViO)
![IMG_6726 (1).jpeg IMG_6726 (1).jpeg](https://www.hifivision.com/data/attachments/76/76124-397a55ab8895972abe7bbe67f85d8391.jpg?hash=fQRGnc7cPn)
One side of the port tube is dummy, just acting as a stand for the speaker. It is not connected to the internal chamber.
The infill for the wall -- I chose "gyroid" which I believe is giving good insulation.
![Screenshot 2025-01-30 at 9.02.23 PM.png Screenshot 2025-01-30 at 9.02.23 PM.png](https://www.hifivision.com/data/attachments/76/76125-b44270ee19e45517b667dbc0705e0a2b.jpg?hash=WfNNM79lH8)
Sounds great for ₹2K investment on the driver. The 3D printing does not cost much if you have your own printer. Just around ₹240 for the material in this case.
Regards,
Arun
![IMG_6728.jpeg IMG_6728.jpeg](https://www.hifivision.com/data/attachments/76/76122-f59c7a852607dc61a4115fa7af4cbd91.jpg?hash=9HdUTeuxfm)
Don't laugh at the shape! It is a design where pure function-over-form was chosen. The sphere is the smallest surface area for a given volume. This means it uses less material and finishes printing faster. It took a day and 6 hours to print this. The port tube is a square cross section and placed 45° rotated to make sure there are no supports which need to be printed. It would be impossible to remove 3D printing supports from within the tube...
Designing a port which can be 3D printed without supports was tricky but a worthy experience
![IMG_6722.jpeg IMG_6722.jpeg](https://www.hifivision.com/data/attachments/76/76123-51b60718532dc346210dc5b86b97cf06.jpg?hash=XzW15QtViO)
![IMG_6726 (1).jpeg IMG_6726 (1).jpeg](https://www.hifivision.com/data/attachments/76/76124-397a55ab8895972abe7bbe67f85d8391.jpg?hash=fQRGnc7cPn)
One side of the port tube is dummy, just acting as a stand for the speaker. It is not connected to the internal chamber.
The infill for the wall -- I chose "gyroid" which I believe is giving good insulation.
![Screenshot 2025-01-30 at 9.02.23 PM.png Screenshot 2025-01-30 at 9.02.23 PM.png](https://www.hifivision.com/data/attachments/76/76125-b44270ee19e45517b667dbc0705e0a2b.jpg?hash=WfNNM79lH8)
Sounds great for ₹2K investment on the driver. The 3D printing does not cost much if you have your own printer. Just around ₹240 for the material in this case.
Regards,
Arun