want to buy a 46' 3D TV. Confused after looking at Sony, samsung and LG.. pls advise
want to buy a 46' 3D TV. Confused after looking at Sony, samsung and LG.. pls advise
Check out the Sony HX800. They are offering a lot of "free" stuff along with it. Plus, it's 2D performance is reportedly good.
Even though i too bought the Samsung 3D tv, I did not buy it for the 3D. I was initially planning to go for the LED 40C6900 which has MRP of 1.09L which I think would have got for around 1L or 0.95L. To top it, I had to buy a blu ray player which would easily cost around 12-14k bringing my total cost to 1.1L. Samsung LED 40C7000 which is 3D model was around 1.2L (1.3MRP) but the package along with it was a C5500 blu ray player (non 3D) and 1 goggle. Sony had a similar or better package but that was LCD (HX800) but came along with 2 goggles, sound bar and better compilation of 3D titles.cant believe ppl are mad for 3d tv
The Sony is actually not too good a deal. The Samsung 46C750 is 110k
with a BR 3D player, 3 glasses and a few 3D titles is a better offer.
Out of stock till yesterday though.
3D requires max screen size possible and a 46 is significantly bigger than
a 40 in.
In terms of usable 3D probably the Panny is best since crosstalk is an issue
with current LCD screens. But it is 163k without any offers (just one set of glasses)
The freebies is only one part ,the main thing about the HX800 is its a limited local dimming set.Crosstalk is also slightly less in the Sony compared to the samsung.
Limited local dimming is actually more of a marketing gimmick in the first gen.
Look at all the reviews. I design systems with edge lit LEDS (10 in and below) and
light uniformity is an issue. Cross talk may be slightly better by 46 in trumps 40 in any day,
It is a significant area size increase. At 40 in even 720p vs 1080p can be tough to make out if 720p encoding is good.