Hello all,
I just bought chord carnival silver screen cable 3 meter pair un-terminated. I was using moster 14guage cable previously using a profigold banana plugs. I changed the connections with the new cable and I could not make out any difference at all. Is it because I am using a cheap banana plug ? The chord terminators were costing 275 a piece. Will it make a difference if I use the chord terminating plugs or use bare wire to terminate ? Or i am not to be expecting any drastic change on the quality when changing the cables from monster 14awg to a chord carnival ss cable ?
TIA.
Regards,
Sabarish
I have done enough experiments in the last few days with various cables (ranging upto rs 26,000) + home made cable. Also between multiple interconnects (ranging from Rs 200 to > Rs 10,000). All I can say is that 6 pair of ears (mine, my son and my wife) couldn't make out any difference. The perceived difference comes only when you tell that the cable being is used is rs 26,000 or the cheap one. However, in blind testing, it was impossible to make out any difference. IMHO having a good RCA interconnect is more important because the audio power levels are very small. In contrast, speaker wire carry substantial higher power output and short speaker cable lengths should make no perceivable difference between different cable manufacturers or your home made cable with enough thickness of the copper wires (thicker the wire, lower is the DC resistance).
The Truth About Interconnects and Cables — Reviews and News from Audioholics
Rubbing the Snake Oil Out of Speaker Cables — Reviews and News from Audioholics
Whether it is silver wire with gold plated connectors or 16 AWG wire with nakamichi terminator or MX gold plated connectors, the result is the same.
With cheap RCA interconnects, however, there was a perceivable detection of hum at high volumes.
My setup is Cadence Arista + Cadence VA 1.0 tube amp.
I also cannot notice any difference in my Yamaha 667 AVR + Polk RTi A9 speakers.
Source is Marantz 6000 OSE
I have done other experimentation too. I can clearly make out difference between Yamaha AVR and Cadence Amp. I can clearly make out difference when I change my speakers between Cadence Arista and Polk RTi A9. I can clearly make out difference when the output is from my CD player, DAC, tape deck or turntable. In each of these cases, the sound signature changes. I can also clearly make out difference between a MP3 and the same song on a CD. But sadly with cables, no change could be noticed
I have read enough and so far I find only cable manufactures advocating high cost cables (with enough of scientific bullshit to confuse users). e.g. litz wire (which is of importance only when frequency reaches MHz), inductance (which can be negligible for short wires), capacitance (which also is extremely negligible if you separate the left and right cables) and resistance (which also is negligible for short cable lenghts and if the material is copper)
My scientific mind at the moment doesn't allow me to believe in costly cables. Cables are mostly snake oil (especially with experimentation made in the last few days) and So so far I firmly believe, costly cables will make no difference unless probably
1) something is wrong with the ears in my entire family
2) something is wrong with the music source
3) My Marantz CD 6000 OSE cd player is not audiophile enough
4) My HTPC with onboard realtek audio is not audiophile enough
5) My HTPC connected to ASUS Xonar DAC is not audiophile enough
I have spoken to people who have found out difference between ordinary cable and high cost cables. So I am confused and keep on trying these experiments with the hope that I can one day find out the difference with my own ears.
It is best to borrow cable and try it out. Buy it only if you can make out the difference. For all you know, your monster cable is as good as the carnival silver cable for your kind of setup and your ears.