ajinkya
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2007
- Messages
- 507
- Points
- 43
This post has nothing to do with audio (hence in General section). I was just reading about Indian's failed cryogenic launch and the media reports on it.
Particularly these two:
Disappointment. India's GSLV D3 mission fails
"It's the second major setback months after the failure of Chandrayaan-1 - India's maiden mission to the moon."
Launch of GSLV-D3, India's first cryogenic rocket, fails - India - The Times of India
"ISRO had invested Rs 330 crore for the prestigious mission whose succesful would have placed India in the elite club of space faring powers US, Russia, China, Japan, and Europe which possess the cryogenic technology. "
Since when did the Chandrayaan mission become branded as a failure? It completed all its mission objectives, was designed and executed at a cost comparable to creating a jet plan (I think it was 1/10 of NASA's cost for similar missions), it found conclusive evidence of water on the moon, it sent back hi-res images of the "dark side of the moon". The only thing it did not do was sustain the satellite for a long duration (like the Mars rovers did). But that was not part of its mission objective. How does the report brand this as a failure and club it in the same class as the cryogenic launch?
The second report talks about the huge investment in the program and names countries who were successful at it. What it does not do is talk about the fact that each of these countries had a failed first attempt at a cryogenic launch, since it is an extremely complex technology to master. It also does not give comparison costs with the other countries programs.
I've found this disgusting, self-deprecating attitude in most Indian news reports about science, technology and India in general. The Chandrayaan was hardly covered in the news beyond its launch date. When the Mars mission was launched, CNN had daily pictures, updates, news for a long, long time, as long as the rovers were operational. In India, it seems we look forward to our failures. Instead of analysing what went wrong and trying to correct it, it seems the media likes to gloat on the failures of the scientists, Army, etc. every time. I am sick of this attitude and just wanted to bring to the notice of fellow forum members.
-Ajinkya.
Particularly these two:
Disappointment. India's GSLV D3 mission fails
"It's the second major setback months after the failure of Chandrayaan-1 - India's maiden mission to the moon."
Launch of GSLV-D3, India's first cryogenic rocket, fails - India - The Times of India
"ISRO had invested Rs 330 crore for the prestigious mission whose succesful would have placed India in the elite club of space faring powers US, Russia, China, Japan, and Europe which possess the cryogenic technology. "
Since when did the Chandrayaan mission become branded as a failure? It completed all its mission objectives, was designed and executed at a cost comparable to creating a jet plan (I think it was 1/10 of NASA's cost for similar missions), it found conclusive evidence of water on the moon, it sent back hi-res images of the "dark side of the moon". The only thing it did not do was sustain the satellite for a long duration (like the Mars rovers did). But that was not part of its mission objective. How does the report brand this as a failure and club it in the same class as the cryogenic launch?
The second report talks about the huge investment in the program and names countries who were successful at it. What it does not do is talk about the fact that each of these countries had a failed first attempt at a cryogenic launch, since it is an extremely complex technology to master. It also does not give comparison costs with the other countries programs.
I've found this disgusting, self-deprecating attitude in most Indian news reports about science, technology and India in general. The Chandrayaan was hardly covered in the news beyond its launch date. When the Mars mission was launched, CNN had daily pictures, updates, news for a long, long time, as long as the rovers were operational. In India, it seems we look forward to our failures. Instead of analysing what went wrong and trying to correct it, it seems the media likes to gloat on the failures of the scientists, Army, etc. every time. I am sick of this attitude and just wanted to bring to the notice of fellow forum members.
-Ajinkya.