could it be that the european and us brands/manufacturers chose to deride bose over time owing to his indian origins
For a long time, there were two things I didn't know about Bose:
1. How to pronounce it.
2. That it was an Indian name!.
Now, I might have been more-than-averagely ignorant on both those points, but I hope I am not the
most ignorant of my race!
I can remember back to the 1950s, where, in my mother country (UK),
made-in-Hong-Kong meant rubbish, and
Empire-Made mean even worse rubbish that the seller didn't want to admit was made in Hong Kong. Of course,
Made-in-Japan, at that time, meant a copy of something made in Europe, with a different name stuck on it. There would have been much more reason not to buy German- or Japanese-made goods, but people still did. I don't think there has ever been any major prejudice against good made, or developed, in India.
Whatever India may have suffered, historically (like... being bled dry, basically), at the hands of my ancestors, and whatever individuals may
still suffer from some that I am not proud to call countrymen, I don't think your lateral thought is correct.
Just my opinion and contribution to the conversation.
It begs another lateral jump, though... How much does India itself value its own? Can something that is
not imported really be seen to be first class? Probably, though, that is an
entirely other conversation, and probably for an entirely other forum too, as I think that members here are just looking for good sound, and the nationality of its development or manufacture probably doesn't figure.
Or do we have our audio-equipment stereotypes? Japanese, British, German, American? We might. I just asked myself: how proud would I feel about owning a Nikon? How proud would I feel about owning a Leica? I can admit there is a difference. I'd have to analyse my feelings rather deeper to decide whether nationality really had anything to do with it.
Well, I guess we are straying way off-topic, but you said it was food for thought, so I did some thinking!
