a bit of background -
along with the decision as to which model of denon avr i should buy as i laid out in this thread
http://www.hifivision.com/surround-amplifiers-receivers/64667-dts-x-atmos-5-1-2-room-eq-worth.html
i also have to make a decision about my speaker setup
currently it is
fronts - wharfedale diamond 8.2
rears - wharfedale diamond 9.0
sub - klipsch 12"
i have a few options which i am listing in ascending order of cost & complexity
1) if i opt for the denon 520 which is 5.1 i can continue with the same setup
2) if i opt for the denon 1200 which is 5.1.2
2a) i can continue with the same setup with the option of biwiring the fronts to the avr's 2 extra unused channel outputs which should reduce the strain on the avr esp since WDs are relatively inefficient speakers (86db @6ohms iirc)
2b) i can buy another pair of WD 9.0s or similar to use as the atmos speakers
2c) i can buy another pair of fronts & use the WD 8.2s as rears (bit of overkill imo, but what the hey) & the current 9.0s as atmos speakers
now if i go for this last option i think i would like to go for speakers that offer a different sound signature. with my last setup with marantz avr i found the setup too warm at times esp for movies & pop/r&b kinda music (though very good for instrumental music, vocals, classical, rock)
so i have auditioned a few BS (max budget - 20k) if i decide to go down that route
so far i have auditioned the following listening to diff genres of music & just a bit of movies (even though my eventual usage will be movies 75 music 25 but i think music gives you better idea of speakers sound sig) -
A) wharfedale diamond 225
very good. seems to have a very flat response across the spectrum ie faithful reproduction of sound without overemphasizing anything. but again on the warmer side. without a direct A/B comparison i'm not sure about much difference between them & 8.2s. they probably have more bass but since i have a sub that wont help me too much.
B) polk tsx220
too sharp. overemphasized treble. will be fatiguing
C) polk rti a3
this is about 7k-8k more than the a1s but the profx dealer didnt have the a1s which is in my budget on demo but assured me the sound signature would be the same.
treble is not overemphasized like the tsx, immediate response is "these are real fun speakers". now i know what they say when they mean "forward speakers"
they were a lot more dynamic than the previous 2 speakers. but on critical listening i realised that the lows & highs are more emphasized than the mids ie the bass & treble seem more clearer than the vocals. not that vocals were unclear, mind. i could immediately make out that these would be great for movies which they were. also very very good for pop/hip hop; with other genres i think the WDs might be a better bet. this is the kind of speakers you want at a party.
D) heard some paradigm towers (not sure of model but dealer didnt have any BS for demo so just to get a sense of the sound sig)
found it too sharp
will be trying to demo BA26 also. i've been told that it'll be similar to the polk sound
the dali zensor 1 is highly rated & within the 20k budget but dont know where i can audition them in mumbai
if i do go the route of option 2c from above & if this was my first pair of speakers i'd probably have gone for the WD 220 but i am now leaning towards the rti a1s atm since it will probably be more punchy & oomphier than my current setup. only thing holding me back is the recessed mids which may not be as good for the indie rock kinda music that i also listen to
it seems that most speakers (at least in this budget range) are either like t20 players (ie flashy, dynamic; usually the american brands like polk etc) or like test players (proper, technically correct but can be staid; european brands like wharfedale etc ). arent there any Virat kind of speakers ie equally good in all formats?![Stick Out Tongue :p :p](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png)
what do you guys think?
along with the decision as to which model of denon avr i should buy as i laid out in this thread
http://www.hifivision.com/surround-amplifiers-receivers/64667-dts-x-atmos-5-1-2-room-eq-worth.html
i also have to make a decision about my speaker setup
currently it is
fronts - wharfedale diamond 8.2
rears - wharfedale diamond 9.0
sub - klipsch 12"
i have a few options which i am listing in ascending order of cost & complexity
1) if i opt for the denon 520 which is 5.1 i can continue with the same setup
2) if i opt for the denon 1200 which is 5.1.2
2a) i can continue with the same setup with the option of biwiring the fronts to the avr's 2 extra unused channel outputs which should reduce the strain on the avr esp since WDs are relatively inefficient speakers (86db @6ohms iirc)
2b) i can buy another pair of WD 9.0s or similar to use as the atmos speakers
2c) i can buy another pair of fronts & use the WD 8.2s as rears (bit of overkill imo, but what the hey) & the current 9.0s as atmos speakers
now if i go for this last option i think i would like to go for speakers that offer a different sound signature. with my last setup with marantz avr i found the setup too warm at times esp for movies & pop/r&b kinda music (though very good for instrumental music, vocals, classical, rock)
so i have auditioned a few BS (max budget - 20k) if i decide to go down that route
so far i have auditioned the following listening to diff genres of music & just a bit of movies (even though my eventual usage will be movies 75 music 25 but i think music gives you better idea of speakers sound sig) -
A) wharfedale diamond 225
very good. seems to have a very flat response across the spectrum ie faithful reproduction of sound without overemphasizing anything. but again on the warmer side. without a direct A/B comparison i'm not sure about much difference between them & 8.2s. they probably have more bass but since i have a sub that wont help me too much.
B) polk tsx220
too sharp. overemphasized treble. will be fatiguing
C) polk rti a3
this is about 7k-8k more than the a1s but the profx dealer didnt have the a1s which is in my budget on demo but assured me the sound signature would be the same.
treble is not overemphasized like the tsx, immediate response is "these are real fun speakers". now i know what they say when they mean "forward speakers"
![Big Grin :D :D](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png)
D) heard some paradigm towers (not sure of model but dealer didnt have any BS for demo so just to get a sense of the sound sig)
found it too sharp
will be trying to demo BA26 also. i've been told that it'll be similar to the polk sound
the dali zensor 1 is highly rated & within the 20k budget but dont know where i can audition them in mumbai
if i do go the route of option 2c from above & if this was my first pair of speakers i'd probably have gone for the WD 220 but i am now leaning towards the rti a1s atm since it will probably be more punchy & oomphier than my current setup. only thing holding me back is the recessed mids which may not be as good for the indie rock kinda music that i also listen to
it seems that most speakers (at least in this budget range) are either like t20 players (ie flashy, dynamic; usually the american brands like polk etc) or like test players (proper, technically correct but can be staid; european brands like wharfedale etc ). arent there any Virat kind of speakers ie equally good in all formats?
![Stick Out Tongue :p :p](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png)
what do you guys think?