Experiencing Dirac Live : A Game-Changer for Sound!

amrutmhatre90

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2020
Messages
1,286
Points
113
Location
Mumbai
I recently had the chance to experience one of the best audio setups I’ve heard to date at Harsh Merchant's place. Many of you may know him as the Country Head of Lenbrook, the parent company for IsoAcoustics, NAD, Bluesound, and PSB. But beyond his professional role, he’s a true audiophile and an incredibly kind person.

Due to scheduling conflicts, I hadn't visited earlier, but when I finally did, it was well worth the wait! We listened to an incredible range of music and had some insightful conversations. Harsh showcased three different setups, and there were several moments when I couldn’t help but smile or even have my jaw drop—whether due to how well a smaller speaker scaled, the choice of cables, or the magic of Dirac room correction.

IMG_6078.JPG

I’m not going to dive into speaker or amplifier comparisons, as I’ve heard plenty of great systems before. But the true star of the day was Dirac! It made me forget about the amp, DAC, and even the speakers themselves. The way Harsh has calibrated his system with Dirac is something everyone should experience. It was a revelation in how well Dirac can perform in a 2-channel system.

We listened to both digital and analog sources, with and without Dirac, and the results were extraordinary. The scale, separation, and depth were unlike anything I’ve heard before—no frequency felt out of place. There were no peaks or dips, and each frequency was presented with pinpoint accuracy. Whether listening at low levels or cranking the volume, no frequency ever overpowered another. And hearing this on analog was the icing on the cake!

His listening room may not be perfectly treated—speakers are near a corner, close to a window, and one side is open—but once you hear it, everything you've listened to before will pale in comparison.

IMG_6088.JPG

IMG_6089.JPG

The Equipment:​

  • Amp: NAD M33
  • Speakers: PSB Synchrony
  • Turntable: Pioneer 500 with a Bronze cartridge
  • Sources: FLACs, Tidal, or Qobuz

I highly recommend anyone in Mumbai to reach out to Harsh for a demo. His setup is a true eye-opener.

My Personal Experience with Dirac:​

After hearing multiple setups with Dirac Live at Harsh’s, I was eager to try it out myself. Since I had already invested in a Hegel H390, the NAD M33 was out of my budget. However, I discovered that the MiniDSP 2x4HD could be upgraded to Dirac Live for just $200.

IMG_6121_jpg.JPG

The upgrade process was simple, but I ran into some issues when connecting it to my MacBook—USB detection failed, and Dirac couldn’t connect to the internet. Switching to a Windows PC solved the problem, and I found Dirac’s measurement process much easier than with REW. The best part was that Dirac automatically creates filters, which I could tweak and save into four presets accessible via the remote. You can also turn Dirac on and off with the remote, making it easy to compare the sound with and without the filters.

D83CD9F2-B2A1-48EA-95F2-C2FCD0BA0830.JPG
IMG_6118.JPG
IMG_6119_jpg.JPG
IMG_6120_jpg.JPG

I’ve placed the MiniDSP between my DAC or phono stage and amp to use Dirac with my analog setup as well.
Add a subheading (1).png

How Dirac Sounds in a 2-Channel System:​

Dirac Live truly transforms the listening experience in a 2-channel setup. The bass becomes tighter and more controlled, eliminating any boominess. High frequencies are clearer, without harshness, and midrange frequencies feel more detailed and balanced.

The real magic happens with the soundstage. Dirac enhances stereo imaging, creating a wider, deeper, and more precise sense of space. Instrument placement is incredibly accurate, and vocals sound more focused and lifelike.

Dirac also optimizes phase alignment, ensuring that all frequencies reach your ears in perfect timing, resulting in a more coherent and seamless sound. Whether at low or high volumes, the sound remains balanced and natural, with no dips or distortion. Clarity and detail are enhanced, revealing micro-details you may have missed before.

It’s like hearing your music for the first time, but in a more natural and accurate way. The result is a system that performs exceptionally across the frequency range, with a sense of balance and depth that’s hard to beat. After using Dirac, the bass was much tighter and more controlled. Once the bass was cleaned up, everything else seemed to fall into place, resulting in a clear and balanced sound. In some tracks, it felt like a veil had been lifted—the soundstage became clearer, wider, and better layered. I was genuinely amazed by the improvement and would highly recommend others to give it a try.

A Few Downsides:​

The MiniDSP 2x4HD has a few limitations: it can’t be shared between PCs without resetting, it only supports one input (requiring manual switching between sources), and it lacks XLR inputs and outputs. There’s also a slight reduction in gain with Dirac, possibly due to headroom limitations.

Some Tips:​

  • Point the mic toward the ceiling during calibration.
  • Use pre-outs from your integrated amplifier for your subwoofer.
  • Calibrate your speakers and subwoofer together as one unit.
  • Take at least three measurements and save the default preset to modify from.

Let me know if anyone has additional tips or experiences with Dirac and MiniDSP—I’d love to hear your thoughts!
 
Very nice write up Amrut ! How do you find the Dirac learning curve as compared to Audyssey XT 32 with respect to ease and user friendliness. Thanks.
 
Very nice write up Amrut ! How do you find the Dirac learning curve as compared to Audyssey XT 32 with respect to ease and user friendliness. Thanks.
Thank you Nitin,

It was easier than I thought, it does take sometime to figure out stuff, but was as good as Audyssey, i think the Dirac Live UI and Software is much better.

I have used Audyssey XT32 in the past with mobile app for home theater,it is good at what it does for the price point. For Dirac you may need to pay for the license but it is well worth it.

For Dirac you need a core to take measurements, it can be your PC or laptop, but I think even a ipad works.
And a endpoint like a AVR, Mini DSP or Dirac enabled Integrated amps like Arcam or NAD. Where the filters or target curves live.

The best part is blusound will be coming with Streamers which will have Dirac Live.
BluSound OS with Dirac live integration, I think it may be a game changer for those who are into digital audio only.
 
Using Analog in and Analog outs, so I think i should be fine.
I am yet to hear how it goes with vinyl, but with what I have heard it should be equally good.
You cannot apply a EQ or a DSP to a signal unless its in digital domain. For Vinyl, the DSP has to be placed after the phono stage, which essentially converts the analog signal to digital. This is now only as good as the quality of the Analogue to digital converter present in the mini dsp. The correction is done inside the mini DSP at 48 KHz, which is again defeating the infinite resolution which was possible for the vinyl.
The same works for Hi res files as well, if you use the DSP, the mini DSP downsamples to 48kHz if Dirac live is used.

If you did not notice any degrade due to both of these phenomena, well I must say, there is nothing wrong in it. Hi res doesnt sound any better anyway than CD. The benefits of having the right tonality is way higher than seeing the numbers like 96 Khz, 192 Khz etc. :p

This is a screenshot from Mini DSP flex's flyer
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-11-22 at 16.20.44.png
    Screenshot 2024-11-22 at 16.20.44.png
    16.2 KB · Views: 10
Thanks @Passive_audio_enthusiast
I am a novice at this, learning and sharing what I find.

I will be using it right after the DAC or Phono,
I also have a XLR from DAC going to the Amp so testing on the fly i do not notice any change in resolution. This is also when I am upsampling everything to PCM 768 or 512 DSD.

Like i have said, not tried it on the vinyl rig yet.

Yet to try it just for Subwoofer too, so will know how it goes.
Preset is in, but need to see how it sounds.
 
Thank you Nitin,

It was easier than I thought, it does take sometime to figure out stuff, but was as good as Audyssey, i think the Dirac Live UI and Software is much better.

I have used Audyssey XT32 in the past with mobile app for home theater,it is good at what it does for the price point. For Dirac you may need to pay for the license but it is well worth it.

For Dirac you need a core to take measurements, it can be your PC or laptop, but I think even a ipad works.
And a endpoint like a AVR, Mini DSP or Dirac enabled Integrated amps like Arcam or NAD. Where the filters or target curves live.

The best part is blusound will be coming with Streamers which will have Dirac Live.
BluSound OS with Dirac live integration, I think it may be a game changer for those who are into digital audio only.
That's really nice to hear Amrut ! Thanks a lot and pls let us know your experiences as you progress with it.
 
Had a paradigm PW Link in the past which supported Anthem room correction , the outcome was sweet but I found just limiting the corrections to the bass region was more beneficial in eliminating some room modes getting activated & retaining the rest as measured. By treating very specific frequencies the speakers presentation also gets altered at times , unless you want something bothering you to be corrected ( like a spike in the upper frequency etc)
 
I will be using it right after the DAC or Phono,
I also have a XLR from DAC going to the Amp so testing on the fly i do not notice any change in resolution. This is also when I am upsampling everything to PCM 768 or 512 DSD.
the DAC decodes the PCM 768/DSD 512 without any problem and the analogue out of your DAC you definitely still would get the so called hi resolution. However once you connect this analogue out to the analogue in of the mini DSP, the internal analogue to digital converter downsamples it to 96khz, for the DSP processing as the filters work at 96khz on the mini DSP flex. If you turn on Dirac Live, it downsamples to 48Khz as the filters for Dirac live works only at 48 KHz. On the 2x4HD even without Dirac it must be downsampled to 48Khz in any case. However, even if one has golden ears, on a blind test, it’s hard to tell apart the downsampled hi resolution audio from the actual full resolution audio.
 
I had a similar home demo from nad team(though didn’t end up buying for other reasons, separate story), but my 2 cents/short summary is any digital processing takes away something which you may feel initially good as being different from what you hear earlier , it is kind of confirmation bias.
I felt voices were pushed back too much and bass reduced drastically. I still feel for 2 channel better placement and good amp are key. Anything like Dirac felt unnatural. For a second think having squeaky clean freq is not how real world music feels like unless you are listening only instrumental and non voice songs then it might make sense but emotions are less natural with digital processing of freq
 
In the end its not about digital or analogue but about distortion. Every component , including the cable and room distorts and hence the most prevalent approach are mainly
- find the most optimal place to setup a speaker
- find the best quality components you can afford..and not all are expensive
-reduce your chain and more the amount of "conversion" more the impact. movement fro one to the other of Digital and analogue is obviously even bigger distortion irrespective if specs

The first is of course the most critical but difficult as it needs skill, and most of us work under lots of constraints hence we use room Eq to cover for that. understandable but unless done by experts brings its own share of problems because every one of these give you something and take away something so it all depends on what compromise you are willing to live with.

For me since its always a constraint of budget, prefer using that in upgrading a component than adding something else :)
 
From a purely technical and engineering point of view, digital /dsp is way more accurate than passive / conventional audio.

The very concept of a passive speaker stems from the vinyl era, where the signal had to be kept analogue end to end. And apart from us limited traditionalists, the audio world at large is going digital, as the source itself is streaming and dsp is unavoidable.

Each to his own, Iam pleased that @amrutmhatre90 has tried with an open mind and liked what he heard. Dirac is just the tip of the iceberg, and there are more options with more functionality in this realm.



1732338746881.png
The above link leads to a state of the art modern digital speaker implementation for those interested. And I have personally moved my vinyl rig and CD player into the closet to try out this new approach. No gaurantee that I will like the end result as I've preferrred less detailed and highly coloured presentations till now, but the price to performance ratio by using digital in this age and time, is too high in this approach to ignore.
 
You cannot apply a EQ or a DSP to a signal unless its in digital domain. For Vinyl, the DSP has to be placed after the phono stage, which essentially converts the analog signal to digital. This is now only as good as the quality of the Analogue to digital converter present in the mini dsp. The correction is done inside the mini DSP at 48 KHz, which is again defeating the infinite resolution which was possible for the vinyl.
The same works for Hi res files as well, if you use the DSP, the mini DSP downsamples to 48kHz if Dirac live is used.

If you did not notice any degrade due to both of these phenomena, well I must say, there is nothing wrong in it. Hi res doesnt sound any better anyway than CD. The benefits of having the right tonality is way higher than seeing the numbers like 96 Khz, 192 Khz etc. :p

This is a screenshot from Mini DSP flex's flyer
The benefits far outweigh the drawbacks in most system.
Any rogue bass disappearing because of DIRAC unveils a lot more details which were masked earlier.

If the system luckily, or by great care taken to sound right without any EQ, then yes some degradation is expected.
 
Using digital tools to enhance sound is akin to applying make up. Done correctly it can enhance natural beauty. But it’s not as easy as it looks. Just as make up needs the right foundation base, using digital correction needs proper system set up and synergy. I have experimented a bit in the past but have not been able to master it.
 
Using digital tools to enhance sound is akin to applying make up. Done correctly it can enhance natural beauty. But it’s not as easy as it looks. Just as make up needs the right foundation base, using digital correction needs proper system set up and synergy. I have experimented a bit in the past but have not been able to master it.
The actual purpose of a EQ, Tone Control, or a DSP is to correct the issues the room creates to your system‘s sound on the way it’s reaching your ears. If you want to see your system without makeup in its natural beauty as you say, you must listen to it in an anechoic chamber.

Some people are lucky to have good rooms by accident. Say for example people who are listening to music where there are lot of book racks around, or if the room has thick curtains, rugs, lot of furniture with foam.. they all naturally damp the sound well to a reasonable level.

I would rather say, a bad room is the one which adds make up to the system, and digital tools like eq, dsp, they all are more of a make up remover.
 
In an anechoic chamber, music will sound horrible. It’s ok for testing. Not for listening.

To me the sound I get in my room is the natural beauty of the system. Whether I need to enhance it or not is a personal call. What I am trying to say is without optimising your system and its interaction with your room, do not get into room correction. First set everything optimally and then decide if you need correction.
 
Pasdive_audio_ehthusiast, as you rightly mentioned if you have a favourable room, nothing like it.

Most problems in a small room is because of the bass. There are nulls and peaks. Option is room treatment or digital room correction. Alternatively you can use 4 sub woofers randomly placed on the 4 sides of the room. This will take care of most peaks and nulls in the room. If bass is sorted, mids and highs open up automatically.
 
I use a minidsp shd studio and it is incredible. It does take a little life out of the system but as @prateekatasniya said, the pros outweigh the cons in my room. I have basic acoustics in place and aligned the speakers first with a laser scale. I could get near perfect center image but it kinda wavers.
Also, the bass even with rel subwoofer was a little boomy.
With dirac live in place, it corrected all the anomalies but somehow decreased the reverberation a little to my taste. However, overall sound is fantastic now.
 
Join WhatsApp group to get HiFiMART.com Offers & Deals delivered to your smartphone!
Back
Top