If you carefully go through the forums topics, you will realize that none who takes / receives advice here recommends LCD for their sound quality. Reason: sound amplification and reproduction is an art and it cannot be achieved in the "wafer" thin models of LCDs. The viedeocon bazookas were good at their time since there were NO influx of internet! So people did not knew what are the better models (except from the idiot box ads!)can only be trumped by a decent stereo/HT setup.
There is a reason why companies have been selling lots of televisions with "500W PMPO" and "bazooka" sound. While this is not high fidelity audio by any stretch of the imagination, some models are leagues ahead of others in the sound department and are sometimes "good enough". I'm sure that many people even in this forum have made compromises in audio quality in their computer speakers or even in their HT setup as long as it has met a minimum acceptable standard.
All I'm saying is that it will be very informative and useful for several readers of this forum to get inputs on audio quality of televisions, along with picture quality.
Had their been 40" version of Dell's LED Monitor G2410....too bad it's still a dreamSo IMHO sound quality is redundant feature. If they would sell LCD/Plasmas without speakers but instead reduced the price by 1k, I would take that.
If you carefully go through the forums topics, you will realize that none who takes / receives advice here recommends LCD for their sound quality. Reason: sound amplification and reproduction is an art and it cannot be achieved in the "wafer" thin models of LCDs. The viedeocon bazookas were good at their time since there were NO influx of internet! So people did not knew what are the better models (except from the idiot box ads!)
If you are still referring to PMPOs, then probably you haven't heard "real" sound yet. I would strongly suggest you go to a AV shop and audition sound.
With regard to your space constraint, I am sure you were watching CRTs before you bought LCD, that space would be enough for good bookshelve speakers. Go and Listen to music as it should sound.
sound amplification and reproduction is an art and it cannot be achieved in the "wafer" thin models of LCDs.
Can you name few? and their prices too? Yes, that is the current research that is going on, but it will take a little time to perfect, till then the prices will remain high.Never say never. There are plenty of drivers and loudspeakers that are not based on the traditional cone driver design. Even among cone drivers, open baffle designs are regarded very highly, and they too are "wafer-thin" as per your definition.
You answered your own query. Sound reproduction in an open air is much different than the "closed" design. And hence, much complicated.Plus, this forum also recommends audiophile grade headphones and earphones, right? (Yes, I know this is not a good example as music fidelity can still be maintained because the drivers don't need to push as much air).
Yes, I have. Go and listen to LG 42LH60YR, which boasts of "virtual 5.1 sound" with 700w PMPO. and then listen to Norge 2060 + Wharf 9.2. And then then tell me.Let me turn your comment around. While I agree with your recommendation, let me ask you. Have you auditioned the sound quality of some of these LCD or plasma models yourself?
Who says Bose is crappy? They are in a different league. Have you noticed their mid-range sound reproduction? Just that not many people are happy with their pricing, and so VFM comes into effect there.just like how crappy Bose is? To your comment about sound amplification, please look at class-T amps (and similar others).
Can you name few? and their prices too? Yes, that is the current research that is going on, but it will take a little time to perfect, till then the prices will remain high.
You answered your own query. Sound reproduction in an open air is much different than the "closed" design. And hence, much complicated.
Yes, I have. Go and listen to LG 42LH60YR, which boasts of "virtual 5.1 sound" with 700w PMPO. and then listen to Norge 2060 + Wharf 9.2. And then then tell me.
Now compare the prices.
42LH60YR will cost you something around 66 - 68K
alternatively pick up any 42" inches which is around 50K (Say 42" LH35 series or sammy 40B530). So you will still have cash left for Norge 2060 (7K) + Wharf 9.2 (~11K)
Now which will you go for?
Who says Bose is crappy? They are in a different league. Have you noticed their mid-range sound reproduction? Just that not many people are happy with their pricing, and so VFM comes into effect there.
hi where did u do ur Phd:licklips: don't misguide the buyer if u do not know. do u think the compamy spends billions in R&D and make a tv to sit amd watch in dark room u lak knowledge:yahoo:
Can you name few? and their prices too? Yes, that is the current research that is going on, but it will take a little time to perfect, till then the prices will remain high.
Yes, I have. Go and listen to LG 42LH60YR, which boasts of "virtual 5.1 sound" with 700w PMPO. and then listen to Norge 2060 + Wharf 9.2. And then then tell me.
Now compare the prices.
42LH60YR will cost you something around 66 - 68K
alternatively pick up any 42" inches which is around 50K (Say 42" LH35 series or sammy 40B530). So you will still have cash left for Norge 2060 (7K) + Wharf 9.2 (~11K)
Now which will you go for?
I don't know what you mean by different league, but I've heard the Bose Acoustimass series, and they're quite crappy. I've heard better depth in Quad bookshelves. Having said that, some of the old Bose speakers are supposedly quite good.Who says Bose is crappy? They are in a different league. Have you noticed their mid-range sound reproduction? Just that not many people are happy with their pricing, and so VFM comes into effect there.
^ I don't. I think given the fact that the SQ however good can be mediocre at best, for anyone who cares about the sound (most people don't), you should be getting a HT. And before you say "not everyone can afford it" I would say the least you can do is buy a 4-5k computer speaker system which will be waaaaaaaaay better than any LCD/Plasma speakers.
So IMHO sound quality is redundant feature. If they would sell LCD/Plasmas without speakers but instead reduced the price by 1k, I would take that.
you are missing the point. you give me best of speaker drivers, best set of woods, and maybe some good labour skills and I will build you a amn good speakers! yes, DIY will be relatively cheaper, but aren't we discussing about complete speakers here?There are plenty of DIY designs, and you can get Fostex drivers for under $200.
Not a VFM argument? you are the one who is comparing between computer speakers & LCD speakers. If VFM is never is picture, then money can buy anything. Every company has its own shop to run. If they make electrostat then they cannot sell it cheap, if it is not cheap it will not compete against other brands (since lot of buyers actually buy the product "off the shelf" and not do a proper research). So yes, LG can produce expensive speakers but they will go bankrupt. So they go as the flow goes.I was making a theoretical point, not a VFM argument. Plus, prices of exotic speakers are often high because they don't have the benefit of scale. If a company like LG decides to do electrostats, they can easily commoditize the technology and make it really cheap.
Well quite surprised about this. They are actually quite good. I have heard their center channel was faulty, but they corrected it later (back in 2006). Since then it was pretty good. Are you sure you used good receiver? Also, those are small cubes, good for your home (except the bass)I don't know what you mean by different league, but I've heard the Bose Acoustimass series, and they're quite crappy.