harishsangwan
New Member
Hey Guys, I was planning to get a LCD TV but after my visit to some stores I have decided to go for a 32" LED TV instead.
I narrowed down to two models as of now:
LG 32LE4610 : Rs34,500/-
Samsung 32D5000 : Rs40,500/-
My budget permits me to get either one of these, but wouldnt wanna spend 40k is its not worth. And my viewing distance would vary from 5-10feet. 5feet for gaming though.
PQ wise both looked equals but since the LG model has IPS panel it looked to have less reflections. And maybe better viewing angle.
Features wise Samsung had an extra USB port and comes with a LAN port that can be used for the All Share feature through DLNA. Not sure if this is worth the extra cash though.
Another thing that I was told by the store guy is that Samsung's '100Hz Clear Motion Rate' is actually equivalent to 50Hz true and hence stating that LG's 100Hz is better than that of Samsung's. Not sure how true that is. What do you guys think?
My usage will be console gaming, watching HD movies and then obviously TV. I am unable to make my mind and would wanna know if Samsung deserves that extra 6k?
I have also been reading that Full HD or HD ready doesnt make much of a difference for 32". That has made me think about the Samsung 32D4000 as well. So help me out guys.
I narrowed down to two models as of now:
LG 32LE4610 : Rs34,500/-
Samsung 32D5000 : Rs40,500/-
My budget permits me to get either one of these, but wouldnt wanna spend 40k is its not worth. And my viewing distance would vary from 5-10feet. 5feet for gaming though.
PQ wise both looked equals but since the LG model has IPS panel it looked to have less reflections. And maybe better viewing angle.
Features wise Samsung had an extra USB port and comes with a LAN port that can be used for the All Share feature through DLNA. Not sure if this is worth the extra cash though.
Another thing that I was told by the store guy is that Samsung's '100Hz Clear Motion Rate' is actually equivalent to 50Hz true and hence stating that LG's 100Hz is better than that of Samsung's. Not sure how true that is. What do you guys think?
My usage will be console gaming, watching HD movies and then obviously TV. I am unable to make my mind and would wanna know if Samsung deserves that extra 6k?
I have also been reading that Full HD or HD ready doesnt make much of a difference for 32". That has made me think about the Samsung 32D4000 as well. So help me out guys.