I auditioned the 270es today. Simply blown away. Absolutely no issue with brightness. IMO native 4k is definitely superior to pixel shifting. More sharpness, detail, depth etc. however the main stand out feature - at-least to my eyes - that stole the show was the black level. Dark scenes simply popped out (screen was a grey screen so that must have helped a lot). I checked out a 4k disc and also streaming. Even 1080p up-sampling looked excellent. My mind is made up now, will pick this up. Thank you all FM's for your feedback. Much appreciated.Hi Sid,
I have Sony 270 es, I am using it in a partially light controlled room. I have a 150 inch elite screen with a gain of 1.3. In my room of 32 by 18 feet. It's brightness is more than adequate. Don't go by the numbers .
It's like comparing apple phone -12 mega pixels to android 42 megapixels.
In a 100 percent light controlled room you will love this projector. It's very vibrant.
There is no comparison between a native 4 k (Sony)and a non native pixelating 2 k projector( Epson).
I hope you would have read it - Epson only superimpose twice and not 4 times like the Benq ht5700- hence it has only half pixels
I have seen it Epson -it has only half pixels and if you watch it close - you will see a lot of pixels in screen
If you want I can send you some video clippings - you will be able to assess it.
Cheers,
Sid