miroflex
Active Member
Hi Miroflex
I have the Sansui AU D7 and the NAD 3020. I find the Phono in the Nad to be better then the Sansui AU D7, that said the phono in the sansui is not bad at all.
Reg the Pricing there is no market price as such for these Vintage. If you like the amp and the amplifier is in good condition then go for it. You will not get a well maintained Vintage amplifier for less price. 12.5k for a Sansui is nothing, Modern day amps starts from 20k and cant even be compared with the Sansui.
Regards
Hi Soundofmusic,
Thanks for your very informative post.
I have been reading an interesting thread on "Older Type Amps" on
Older Type Amps [Archive] - Stereo Net Australia
This has contrary views on the quality of older amps. Some quotes:
"The PM80 and PM80-II were very, very good amps. As incidentally was the matching CD player."
"I will have to disagree...I have owned a Marantz PM 80 SE. Terrible sounding amps-either run in Class A or A/B. Very coarse, dry and hazy sounding amps. I never compared it to a Pioneer A400 but would guess that it would not be nearly as good-especially in terms of quality and soundstaging.
"The vast majority of old integrated amps suffer from poor sounding preamp sections. Modern preamps are much better."
I find all this rather confusing as the Marantz and the Pioneer were highly regarded in their day by the British hifi magazines as "giant killers" and the ones to beat in their class.
I am looking for an integrated amp to partner my Sonodyne RP 4000 turntable with a Classic MM cartridge. Would a Marantz PM7003 yield better sound quality than an older PM80? Would it be better to go in for a Project preamp? (I am using a Philips preamp with a Sonodyne Uranus II amplifier and speakers. The set up has a warmish sound. I listen to Indian classical music and ghazals and film songs mostly. Also Western classical music and jazz.)
Thanks and regards.