My first attempt at setting up a Hi-Fi system

deepestpurple

Active Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2011
Messages
98
Points
43
Location
Bangalore
Finally managed to get my Hi-Fi system in place :yahoo:

Quadral Ascent 90 Speakers
Naim Nait 5i Mk 11 Integrated Amp
Cambridge Audio Azur 651C CD player
Musical Fidelity M1 DAC
Kimber Kable 8PR speaker cables

Must admit the journey of auditioning the components and then choosing one was really awesome :clapping:
 
Last edited:
Looks like each one is hand picked after a series of auditions. Do post your reviews on the system.
 
I had a question on the choice of your equipment? Is there any specific reason you went with the Azur 651C instead of, say Azur 351C, given the fact that you would be using the MF M1 DAC in the system?
 
Congratulations on your purchase! The components look very impressive.

If you do not mind sharing, can you tell us how much the Naim integrated amplifier cost you? Where did you buy it from?

Best,
APK
 
Dear All,

Thank you for your wishes and comments :)

Since I have received few queries on how I went about selecting the components, i think it is important that I talk about my music taste and my room details before that.

My current music system is setup in my living room which is 24ft by 24ft and I listen to all genres of music barring Rap & Hip Hop :D The same living room also serves as my movie screening hall. So essentially I was looking for speakers which could double up as HT speakers too without compromising much on the musical note.

I auditioned the following speakers before choosing Quadral Ascent 90 -

1. Monitor Audio Silver & Gold series
2. Polestar Danavox Vanguard F1
3. Magnepan 1.6
4. Mordaunt Short Aviano & Mezzo
5. Accoustic Energy Radiance
5. KEF Q900
6. Matin Logan Motion Series
7. ATC SCM 40

Quadral Ascent 90 has a very transparent sound and was not high on low frequencies. Considering my room size, it is very difficult to control the booming bass. ATC SCM 40 was obviously the best but it needed huge amount of investment to set it up properly with all components :sad: I am hoping I will be able to upgrade in a year or two to the world of ATC's :)

Amongst amps, I listened to Nu Force, Musical Fidelity, Arcam, Cambridge Audio, Rotel, Denon, Onkyo, Marantz. I had no chance to listen to Naim Nait 5i but bought it (from singapore) purely on the recommendation of a very good friend of mine :) Must admit it is an amazing sounding amp and even though it is rated 50W @ 8ohm, I can't even cross beyond 10'O clock mark. Yes it is that loud and sweet :)

Choosing the CD player took a long time !!! I was initially inclined to get the Naim 5Si but Naim CD5 XS was what my friend suggested. It was again over budget for me. So chose Azur 651C after listening to players from Magnet, Musical Fidelity, Arcam, Cambridge Audio, Marantz. Also chose Azur 651C over any other lower Azur models because 651C has 3 filter settings which allowed me to control the lower frequencies. In fact I change the filter settings based on the type of music I am listening too :)

As for the DAC, I just fell in love with the sound of Musical Fidelity M1 at first hearing ...

For speaker cables, could not get Naim NAC-A5. Hence opted for Kimber Kable's 8PR (which i bought second hand from a friend of mine)

Lastly the list of cd's I used for my audition. I have a standard set of 8 cd's that I use -

1. Soundtrack from Black Friday by Indian Ocean
2. Remembering Shakti by Shakti
3. Led Zeppelin's BBC Sessions
4. Metallica's Black Album
5. Tracy Chapman's Greatest Hit
6. Dire Straits On Every Street
7. Dream Theatre's Score
8. Raising Sand by Robert Plant & Alison Krauss

It took me good 18 months to learn about hi-fi systems, audition them and then of course save the money to be able to afford it :)
 
Very nice description of your auditioning and buying process. Kudos to you!

Just a quick question, how would you compare the ATC to the Maggies? Also any price indications on both. BTW, how much did the Naim cost you (landed) to Bangalore?

Thanks,
APK
 
Thanks APK :)

Actually the technology differs between ATC & Magnepan. Hence the sounds are very different as per me. I agree that no single speaker will make all type of music sound great but in my limited exposure I found ATC SCM40 to be near perfect. The Magnepans has great soundstage when I played music which had higher frequency notes and less lower frequency components. Hence my heavy metal & rock cd's sounded very disengaged.

As for the price, ATC SCM40 I think ranges anywhere between 280k INR to 300k INR based on the shop you buy from. I have checked the prices in Singapore too but it does not make sense to get it from there because whatever you will save in cost you will end up in paying in transport charges :) The Magnepan 1.7 I think is around 180 INR. The landing cost for Naim Nait 5i was approx 110k INR.
 
Thanks APK :) I did a quick reply to your query but can't see the post :(

So retyping my response -

The ATC & Magnepans differ in technology. Hence the sounds, to me, is very different. Magnepan had a great soundstage when i played music which were had more high frequencies notes and less lower frequency notes. That is why my heavy metal/rock music sounded dud and disengaged. I agree that it is very difficult for a single speaker to make sound all type of music great but ATC SCM40 is just near perfect to me :) No matter what CD I listened to it sounded very good.

As regards prices, ATC SCM40 I think ranges from 280k-300k INR, Magnepan is 180k-200k INR. Landing cost of Naim Nait 5i was 110k INR for me.

Hope this helps ...
 
Magnepan had a great soundstage when i played music which were had more high frequencies notes and less lower frequency notes. That is why my heavy metal/rock music sounded dud and disengaged.

Thanks for your reply. Yes, that was my observation too when I had heard the Maggies in the US a few years ago - very good in the upper frequencies, but failed to do any bass. Never got a chance to hear the ATC, and hence the question.

ATCs are known to be very neutral in its presentation, and excellent all rounders. Finicky about upstream components. Was that your observation too? What kind of a speaker is the Quadral Ascent 90 (never had a chance to listen to this brand of speaker).

Appreciate your thoughts.....

Best,
APK
 
Interesting choice of components. Never heard a quadral before. Could you please tell me who is the dealer for those in bangalore?

I'm also curious why you didn't pick up the ATC bookshelves (SCM11 or SCM19) since they cost significantly less than the floorstanding SCM40 and sound very very similar.
 
Last edited:
I'm also curious why you didn't pick up the ATC bookshelves (SCM11 or SCM19) since they cost significantly less than the floorstanding SCM40 and sound very very similar.

@ROC, I spent some time listening to the 40, and owned the 19. To my ears the high frequency presentation of the 19 was significantly different from the 40 and IMO much superior as well. Just my layman's observations.
Cheers,
Sid
 
Finally managed to get my Hi-Fi system in place :yahoo:

Quadral Ascent 90 Speakers
Naim Nait 5i Mk 11 Integrated Amp
Cambridge Audio Azur 651C CD player
Musical Fidelity M1 DAC
Kimber Kable 8PR speaker cables

Must admit the journey of auditioning the components and then choosing one was really awesome :clapping:

Congrats pal ... You have put in lot of effort, time & patience in building your system :) By the way ...

Which digital cable are you using from your CDP to DAC?
Which interconnects are you using from your DAC to AMP?
Are you using any device for AC voltage stabilizing & spike/surge protection?

Cheers ... Ramesh @ Bangalore
 
@ROC, I spent some time listening to the 40, and owned the 19. To my ears the high frequency presentation of the 19 was significantly different from the 40 and IMO much superior as well. Just my layman's observations.
Cheers,
Sid

I believe the SCM19 has a superior tweeter and midbass driver compared to the SCM40. The SCM19 has the much famed super linear mid bass driver. So I'm not surprised. However the little experience I have hearing the SCM11 and SCM40, they sounded as if they were cut from the same cloth.

I'm also curious about how you'd compare your SHL5 with the SCM19.

Cheers!
 
I'm also curious about how you'd compare your SHL5 with the SCM19.

Cheers!

Sorry Op for the OT. The biggest deficiency of the 19 in my room was bass extension. Is was very underwhelming and where the SHL5 was significantly better. High frequency was probabaly the same, with my preference tilting towards the Shl5 possibly due to the supertweeter. Midrange I would call it equal . ATC's were dead neutral (as they are famous for), whereas I felt the SHL5 were slightly on the forward side of neutral and consequently more exciting to my ears. In areas of soundstage envelopment both were similar with maybe a smidgen more of advantage to the Shl5. Anyways the 19 is an excellent speaker and as I said better that the 40. If I didn't have the Shl5, I would choose it in an instant, with the caveat that bass extension would be limited.
Cheers,
Sid
 
Follow HiFiMART on Instagram for offers, deals and FREE giveaways!
Back
Top