My previous post on this subject was directed at the Moderators, requesting a clarification whether it was OK to make public the name (or moniker) of Sellers on the ‘For Sale’ forum with whom one has had a bad experience. This was because there is no such provision in the Forum Rules, and doing so has consequences. There was substantial response to this thread, many from FMs who’d had similar experiences, and some from those who did not want any impact on the continuance of this Forum topic, which, as everyone knows, is one of the most popular on this site. A few missed the woods for the trees, but that is another matter.
To reiterate, I bought an item from an FM on this site which turned out to be dead on arrival. This was intrinsic to the item, not something that could have been damaged in transit because of poor packaging or courier mishandling. The seller was in another city, which made prior auditioning impossible. A clear case of misrepresentation of condition. What is important to note was that the seller did not contest the situation, nor disagree with my findings, but also immediately agreed to make a full refund. This has unfortunately not happened, and he has fobbed me off with various excuses and postponements over the past six months. Yes, I’ve been patient, as I considered it fair to give him time to arrange the funds, which he claimed to be short of. I have now realised that I will not get my money back, and will have to write it off. In the meantime, this seller has put up many other items on this forum for salle, a professional seller of sorts, and it is very likely other buyers on this group might get hurt. Which is why the question to the Moderators.
Anyway, this permission has now been granted, and I reveal the name of the seller Suman Homroy, from Calcutta, who currently has a couple of amplifiers up for sale on this forum. He is free to give his ‘side of the story’. The facts are as stated, and the nature of the item and it’s price are not relevant.
To reiterate, I bought an item from an FM on this site which turned out to be dead on arrival. This was intrinsic to the item, not something that could have been damaged in transit because of poor packaging or courier mishandling. The seller was in another city, which made prior auditioning impossible. A clear case of misrepresentation of condition. What is important to note was that the seller did not contest the situation, nor disagree with my findings, but also immediately agreed to make a full refund. This has unfortunately not happened, and he has fobbed me off with various excuses and postponements over the past six months. Yes, I’ve been patient, as I considered it fair to give him time to arrange the funds, which he claimed to be short of. I have now realised that I will not get my money back, and will have to write it off. In the meantime, this seller has put up many other items on this forum for salle, a professional seller of sorts, and it is very likely other buyers on this group might get hurt. Which is why the question to the Moderators.
Anyway, this permission has now been granted, and I reveal the name of the seller Suman Homroy, from Calcutta, who currently has a couple of amplifiers up for sale on this forum. He is free to give his ‘side of the story’. The facts are as stated, and the nature of the item and it’s price are not relevant.