What has this got to do with the type of DAC I wonder?????speakers emphasize on midrange, you have the luxury to experiment with Delta-Sigma DACs
What has this got to do with the type of DAC I wonder?????speakers emphasize on midrange, you have the luxury to experiment with Delta-Sigma DACs
Do not keep the DAC under a Tube preamp ; Remove it ASAP.I picked up the SMSL SU9 and I am super happy with it. Comes with almost all bells and whistles, and I needed something with a internal power supply and did not need different PSUs to ulter sound.
Paired it with Volumio Premium and playing Spotify and Tidal with MQA decoding. View attachment 67550
I forgot to mention that the Indiq's are quite forgiving and given how Delta-Sigmas sound more analytical compared to Denfrips Ares II, based my statement on that.What has this got to do with the type of DAC I wonder?????
Do not keep the DAC under a Tube preamp ; Remove it ASAP.
To universally categorize SD Dacs as analytical and R2R as forgiving or the Denafrips in particular is in my opinion generalisation.I forgot to mention that the Indiq's are quite forgiving and given how Delta-Sigmas sound more analytical compared to Denfrips Ares II, based my statement on that.
Yes, the Indiq speakers are rolled off on the highs.If IndiQ speakers are forgiving, then does it mean that the upper mids to highs are rolled off???
In that case a forgiving DAC will even more colour the sound of the speakers.
That is why every component in the chain is critical (the speakers the most as that is the one that simulates the ear's diaphrams). So when each component is seen the isolation, it becomes difficult to decipher the final output.
Could you please give some examples and if you've heard any of them yourself. ThanksMy whole point was to tell the OP that E50 is far more resolving compared to an average CD player or streamer's in-built DAC. Also, several R-2R DACs have created wonders with Indiq speakers.
Have you completely switched to the NAD preamp from the Fx-03?Yes, done removed it long back, Thanks.
Normally I don't use that Pre amp and it is switched off
They were mostly custom/DIY and non-forum discussions. I've heard one DIY paired with Platinum Achals.Could you please give some examples and if you've heard any of them yourself. Thanks
90% as NAD Pre amp is a Class A one and sounds very goodHave you completely switched to the NAD preamp from the Fx-03?
Don’t agree to this.My whole point was to tell the OP that E50 is far more resolving compared to an average CD player or streamer's in-built DAC.
Thanks for this. Proves time and again why subjectivity matters.Don’t agree to this.
I’ve the E50 alongwith 3 CD players. Check my signature.
I’ve extensively compared native player sound with the sound of E50 played through the Denon CDP via coaxial.
To my ears , out of this combination, the NAD CD player by itself sounds the best.
This is followed by the Denon transport +E50 combo.
Third is Marantz CDP played by itself.
Do note that the differences are subtle and only apparent when you listen and compare very closely.
My sources are all CDs , mostly original. I listen to classic rock , jazz , ghazals, bengali folk etc.
PS: I’ve dedicated power supply for the E50 as well (Allo Nirvana) which improves the sound over a native mobile charger (how and why I’ve no clue )
What I mean is that, if he owns a decent cd player/streamer around 50-70k the E50 is not going to help which costs 12k. The difference might not be big enough to notice. It might also degrade the SQ that he was getting before.Curious to know about your reasoning behind this statement.
Assuming that you have actually heard with the E50, just like what other experienced FMs have mentioned above, you must be having high quality source and speakers to ascertain the SQ difference (or the lack thereof) between the E50 and CD player or streamer's DAC.
The E50 costs double that price. You are confusing it with E30.What I mean is that, if he owns a decent cd player/streamer around 50-70k the E50 is not going to help which costs 12k. The difference might not be big enough to notice. It might also degrade the SQ that he was getting before.
oh....yes you are correct.The E50 costs double that price. You are confusing it with E30.