If changing the pixel size is termed as manufacturing process change, then I see why LG is replacing so many panels. LG is still stuck with decade-old VTE for manufacturing of their consumer OLED panels. Only TCL is getting their hands dirty with Solution-processed OLED for their H-QLED line display.
Well, in a tech forum, the purpose is to share the knowledge. But unfortunately, some self-proclaimed expert is more interested in showing off? What’s his credential? Professional calibrator - No, LG employee -No, Working in Semiconductor Industry -No, the only credential is C9 Owner. If owning a product makes one an Expert, then I should be have been a JW Master Blender by Now
. But I understand some people are just incapable of having a civilized healthy discussion.
Clearly you don't know about JOLED or Samsung's own push for QD-OLED or LG's own plans for bringing top emission to panels, which they are using for 8K OLED. And oh, guess which company is the only one manufacturing millions of panel every year for OLED TVs? LG!!
And oh, subpixel pixel and aperture ratio improvements don't require any manufacturing change process at all. Cramming more substrate into the same area and changing the configuration of the entire plant to move to a new printing structure isn't a part of the manufacturing process. They get one of their employee's babies into the plant who sleeps all day and poops and as they change the diapers of the baby, the entire manufacturing process changes to now produce panels that have a different pixel structure and crams more substrate into the same area. They took a chance on the right manufacturing process, stuck with it, refined it, invested billions in it and are now primed for profit, pushing everyone else to move too or be left behind, including Samsung.
What you're doing again is changing the goalpost. Love doing that, don't you?
Q60/Q70 good. OLED bad not bright. But Q60 less than bright any OLED in the market and Q70 less bright than the most popular OLED, along with just having 200 nits on a 1% window. Point that out, and you move to LCD being used for reference monitors instead of OLED now, forgetting that those LCDs are completely different than Q70, and they don't use FALD, they employ a dual-cell layer. Completely unrelated to to the discussion or Q70. That's your power move. Deflect to something else when you're wrong.
Same here. You wrote; nothing changed in the manufacturing process. Point out changes, and you want them to overhaul the entire production, discarding the billions they invested in the current one, which they have CHANGED to respond to the burn-in.
But oh, those changes don't matter. Only when they drown billions, will you accept them as changes. Nothing changed till then. Just magically subpixel became bigger...not once, but twice!! Aperture ratio improved on its own. Maybe they started singing to the machines as they printed the panels, and that made the machines happy and they did LG a favor.