jayantadak
Active Member
Hi,
Just purchased the Pioneer DVD player dv 220. There is no optical connectivity hence they have not supplied the cable. It has co-axial connectivity, and the usual composite connections. I don't have an HDMI TV, hence the HDMI cable which they have supplied is of no use to me right now.
Should I go for the co-axial connection ( for AUDIO) or should I be putting up the usual composite connections. If there is an edge in using co-axial, I would buy the co-axial cables. My amp has the co-axial slot as well. Is there a difference in performance between optical and co-axial cables. Initially I was using the Pioneer DV 366 which had an optical connection.
Just enlighten me: Optical and Co-axial cables carry only the audio signals. Right or wrong ??
JAYANT ADAK
Just purchased the Pioneer DVD player dv 220. There is no optical connectivity hence they have not supplied the cable. It has co-axial connectivity, and the usual composite connections. I don't have an HDMI TV, hence the HDMI cable which they have supplied is of no use to me right now.
Should I go for the co-axial connection ( for AUDIO) or should I be putting up the usual composite connections. If there is an edge in using co-axial, I would buy the co-axial cables. My amp has the co-axial slot as well. Is there a difference in performance between optical and co-axial cables. Initially I was using the Pioneer DV 366 which had an optical connection.
Just enlighten me: Optical and Co-axial cables carry only the audio signals. Right or wrong ??
JAYANT ADAK