OP is looking for 65 inches.LG BX is option.. on Amazon it's price 1.5
OP is looking for 65 inches.LG BX is option.. on Amazon it's price 1.5
That's a 55incher though...LG BX is option.. on Amazon it's price 1.5
Ya need a 65 incher for sure as my living room distance from sofa to TV is around 14 feet.
That's a 55incher though...
Lol didn't see that my bad.....well it's better for u wait for diwali sale try on Amazon and flipkart on those days when they claim big "sale" who know u might get surprise and then try local store on last day of Vijaya Dasami..as it start of sale season I guess (just sayin of wht i heard...might be true or might not be abt sale date )OP is looking for 65 inches.
I know pq of q70r is better than sthe frame. So am asking is it worth to get the frame only for 2.1?Lol didn't see that my bad.....well it's better for u wait for diwali sale try on Amazon and flipkart on those days when they claim big "sale" who know u might get surprise and then try local store on last day of Vijaya Dasami..as it start of sale season I guess (just sayin of wht i heard...might be true or might not be abt sale date )
OLED in 1.5 is not available in 65 u want best option for u is the frame 1.39 plus some cash back don't know if that scheme is there or not...or Q70r if u get it under 1.5 tht is..but no.. 2.1
By looking at this side by side comparison, looks like Q70R provides a better VFM. Additionally Q70R supports local dimming. Although, it doesn't support hdmi 2.1, but Q70 can handle 4K at up to 120Hz, dynamic metadata (HDR10+), variable refresh rate (VRR), and auto low latency mode (ALLM).Hello everyone. My budget for a 65 inch TV is between 1-1.3L. Which of the 2 models should I buy? My usage will include watching movies , sports and playing PlayStation 4/5 in moderate/good lighting.
I don't think it's possible to handle 4k@120hz without hdmi 2.1By looking at this side by side comparison, looks like Q70R provides a better VFM. Additionally Q70R supports local dimming. Although, it doesn't support hdmi 2.1, but Q70 can handle 4K at up to 120Hz, dynamic metadata (HDR10+), variable refresh rate (VRR), and auto low latency mode (ALLM).
Samsung Q70/Q70R QLED vs Samsung The Frame 2020 Side-by-Side TV Comparison
Compare the Samsung Q70/Q70R QLED and Samsung The Frame 2020 TVswww.rtings.com
It's not. The Rtings link also mentions that. Should have read his own link....I don't think it's possible to handle 4k@120hz without hdmi 2.1
You know, I too had the same doubt when I saw this in TechRadar. Technically, if it supports 4K 60Hz at full 4:4:4 color, it's kinda possible squeeze 4K 120Hz at 4:2:0 color (which halves the bandwidth usage), as long as the processor has enough juice to support that kind of load. Samsung is squeezing every bit of HDMI 2.0 (b) to make their spec sheet look good.I don't think it's possible to handle 4k@120hz without hdmi 2.1
This is beyond the specs of hdmi 2.0b and I don't think any consoles will support that. For pc, it will make the display look worse, specially for text. So for all practical purposes, it is useless IMHO.You know, I too had the same doubt when I saw this in TechRadar. Technically, if it supports 4K 60Hz at full 4:4:4 color, it's kinda possible squeeze 4K 120Hz at 4:2:0 color (which halves the bandwidth usage), as long as the processor has enough juice to support that kind of load. Samsung is squeezing every bit of HDMI 2.0 (b) to make their spec sheet look good.
Well, for PC Gaming 4:2:0 may not be a good idea, although Games are designed in such a way not to get affected much by Croma Sampling. For pure video contents like Movies, it's fine. As I said, manufacturer claim a lot to boost their spec sheet but how they perform at field is always debatable.This is beyond the specs of hdmi 2.0b and I don't think any consoles will support that. For pc, it will make the display look worse, specially for text. So for all practical purposes, it is useless IMHO.
If u are doin pc gaming ..then yes 2.1 is need for 120hz...if only Console gaming go for q70r it only multiplayer game like Cod or gears something is gonna be 120 for now.. future who knows yet u still have 120hz as native who is more then enough...I know pq of q70r is better than sthe frame. So am asking is it worth to get the frame only for 2.1?
Btw what's the price Q70r u getting ?? As it shown on website its quite expensive..
Around 1.35L for 65 inch.If u are doin pc gaming ..then yes 2.1 is need for 120hz...if only Console gaming go for q70r it only multiplayer game like Cod or gears something is gonna be 120 for now.. future who knows yet u still have 120hz as native who is more then enough...
Btw what's the price Q70r u getting ?? As it shown on website its quite expensive..
Damn thts good considering online price on official website shows around 2L...Around 1.35L for 65 inch.
Damn thts good considering online price on official website shows around 2L...
as things stand you either have the frame but no backlight 65 inch with 2.1 which you want is there...or you have to compromise on size and get OLED for extra 10-20k... At the end of the day wht matter is wht do u want most 2.1 , backlight or those viewing angels, size....if u want all.. u have to let go of price...Yes but still, the major missing point is HDMI 2.1. If I am spending so much on a TV in 2020, I might as well buy one with atleast 1HDMI 2.1 port.
as things stand you either have the frame but no backlight 65 inch with 2.1 which you want is there...or you have to compromise on size and get OLED for extra 10-20k... At the end of the day wht matter is wht do u want most 2.1 , backlight or those viewing angels, size....if u want all.. u have to let go of price...
Go with the x900H.Hi I have now decided to pick 1 between Sony x900h and LG BX - 55 inches
Both good choice bro.. congratulations in advance..I have now decided to pick 1 between Sony x900h and LG BX - 55 inches