Hi All,
As you all know and as discussed in this thread, I was not happy with the sound stage of my setup.It was leaning to a side , smeared, not high etc..
Most of the issues were fixed following the advice from our esteemed forum members.
Specially remembering advice from
@audiopro on speaker positioning.
Also thanking all forum members who spent time with your inputs in this thread.
Even though most of the issues were fixed,I always felt something is still wrong.
Now to the story,
Special thanks to forum member
@Orko for his inputs.
Knowing he was a happy user of Harbeth 30.1, I approached him for help.The conversation started with me asking advice on changing my amplifier to some thing better knowing he use croft integrated and I wanted to know more about croft.
Orko suggested using open timer stands which in his setup was a major improvement.To start with , to know if it would make any difference in my setup, he suggested isolating my speakers from my stands.
Special thanks to @prem for suggesting this earlier, but I was hesitating to try it as I was afraid of the stability of my speakers with my 4 yr old running around.
So I started the exercise by placing rubber spacers under the speakers.To my surprise, the improvement was very evident.Much more coherent open sound.This gave the go ahead to procure a timber open stand.Unfortunately,the timber open stands are very expensive to buy or even get it made by a Carpenter(in this country).
The only option was DIY. So I managed to make one myself.(see image)
To my surprise the sound was not to my liking, it was an open sound but no focus, no bass definition etc.
So I played with the positioning as Orko suggested.
But I was still not happy with the results.The reference was the coherent sound I achieved with the spacers on my original glass stand.
So I went ahead with the following exercises,
Step 1: A sandstone slab placed under the timber stands.The sound was more lively. But the sound was not to my liking.
Step 2:Managed to insert thread inserts under the timber stands(It was a risky move as it could break the timber tenons) some how managed it and spiked the stands. repositioned the speakers, now sound was more hifi, more focused bass,etc etc.. but ..still not satisfied..
Step 3: Placed rubber spacers on the timber tenons under the speakers .Didnt work to my expectation.
Step 3; Gone back to the original point were I started , i.e original glass stands with rubber spacers under speakers.Due to change from original position or so , i did not achieve the sound I was looking for , so I played with the positioning further and still was not satisfied.
Step 4: Now I removed the spikes from my glass stand and replaced them with 6mm furniture glide insert( see image) to decouple the stands as well to an extent.and now I think I have achieved what I was looking for.
So happy with the result(step 4) as of now, more coherent sound open sound where music sounds as a whole thing, now it it is difficult to focus on individual aspects of the hifi like sound stage, bass, treble,, etc etc..Can I say the system is more musical, what I hear now is music which makes you feel that everything in the recording has a reason, if that makes sense.
So decoupling works in my room I think..
So the moral of the story is,
- please don't disregard the importance of speaker positioning.
- equally important is the coupling/decoupling of your speakers.decoupling worked in my setup.
- raising the bottom of speakers, will improve the sound at least in my case (BBC thin wall monitors).
Note: The front wall position is 1/7 to the front baffle of the speaker from front wall ,1/3 and 1/5 are not practical in my room. .This comes from
@prem s speaker positioning thread.
1/7 th works the magic, even though I can move the speakers a little more into the room,the sound is best at 1/7 th. If I move the speakers further into the room, the sound degrades contrary to what you would expect.
Question:Still wondering why the timber stands didn't work as expected.Any idea??