Yes, of course. He should be named to alert other FMs. I remember reading a couple of bad experiences, one involving Sid.
Yes such people are everywhere. :sad:when I was in college I used to have some friend who would borrow new cassettes from me and then coolly tell me - "sorry I lost your cassette", "sorry it was in my bag which was stolen", "sorry the tape got chewed up in my Walkman" (and would give me a whole bunch of tape). Thinking back, I was definitely conned. One clever jack used to borrow my cassettes and then say, he lost it and would buy me another to replace the one he lost, but brought me new cassettes which be bought but did not actually like. He would say, "I tried for your title but could not fine it, so I got one which I think you'll like". Good way to dispose them (or exchange them) off
A member from Hyderabad told me that this particular member indulges in buying and selling stuff. For all you know, he may have sold that amp for a profit.Pretty sad. I am sure the guy turned real greedy about the amp and didn't want to part with it.
perhaps it would be better to name & shame, so that others don't get conned in the future.
I agree with Sid
Personally, I value reputation which is far more valuable than pecuniary gain, however big it is. Hence I feel it would be harsh on my part to name the member just because of my loss.Yes, of course. He should be named to alert other FMs.
If any member makes any accusations about any retailer/ manufacturer/ distributor/ dealer or individual member, they must first submit a verified/certified photo identity proof of their full name and address to forums admin along with verified/certified proof of the accusation. It's easy to exaggerate the events to favour your side of the story, but ultimately this is not the truth if you cannot backup your accusations without proof. Posting any such information without relevant proof will lead to your immediate ban without any warning.
Though short-lived, that amp used to sound divine. In the hindsight, I should've gone to some other technician before writing it off.This is my personal view.
I had ( have......but dismantled !) the Luxman LV102 . If that is a higher model than the L80 isn't probably too big a loss. The 102 was rolled off and was audibly poorer than current day amps. By that I mean it didn't have crisp HF, deep and tight bass etc.
By itself it didn't sound too bad but certainly not what we are used to nowadays ! I paid 3k for it and thought it was a bad buy ! I expected a lot from it. However I have heard other Luxmans that were very good. L-10 and the stereo power amps from the 80's.
I don't think so. I could easily sense that he was lying. I was livid and went to the extent of saying that I'll lodge a police complaint against the mechanic but he was overtly defending that person. He kept saying "Leave it sir, he is a poor mechanic. For you this is a small thing." I understood the futility of persuing it any further.in his defence, the cock and bull story could have been cooked up by the tech also.
A contrarian view here - it could all very well have been true. Nothing new about small [illegal?] roadside shops being knocked down without notice for road widening work etc. and their goods being damaged/confiscated.in his defence, the cock and bull story could have been cooked up by the tech also.
@keith, at that point of time, I was so adamant that I demanded even the mangled remains of the amp. He said that only the faceplate is left out. He couldn't produce even that as evidence.
Moreover, unlike robots, we humans have a sensory perception that can clearly sense what's going on. Hope you agree with me.
the sound transformer is defective and needs a replacement, which they're unable to find.
Even I thought the same, no its not the power transformer. It is getting on without issues, no sound..It's a solid state amp - the only transformer would be the power transformer. Or am I missing something here ?
You mean like "common sense" which is not at all common in people?<snip>Moreover, unlike robots, we humans have a sensory perception that can clearly sense what's going on. Hope you agree with me.
Even I thought the same, no its not the power transformer. It is getting on without issues, no sound..
Its slightly small transformer in front of it which is called as "sound transformer" both of the experienced technicians told me the same thing. I will post the pictures once I get it back.
Sent from my Redmi Note 3 using Tapatalk
You mean like "common sense" which is not at all common in people?
looking at the service manual, i see something like a transformer at the CD input- if this is faulty, you should still be able to use the other inputs
from the schematic, its an inductor, and from onkyo literature, its called an in phase transformer - its still a power stage transformer
http://www.cieri.net/Documenti/Altri marchi/Onkyo - Circuitazione Real-Phase (1985).pdf
getting a replacement might be tough, perhaps rewind, but this is a custom item, so may not be everyone's cup of tea