40C650 or PS50C550 ?

@Blasto, i will be demoing the sets in a week and post here my observations soon.

@josedandrew : As per your information if 97% situation is covered, then i would be very happy to let go of the premium.

By the way, can anyone let me know the quality of SD content on C550. Due to screen size being 50", will there be any difference. Is it like less the size (40" LCD) , more the quality of SD ?

Please throw light on this issue.
 
By the way, can anyone let me know the quality of SD content on C550. Due to screen size being 50", will there be any difference. Is it like less the size (40" LCD) , more the quality of SD ?

Please throw light on this issue.

The SD content delivered over regular DTH channel does not look that great on 50c550, specially if the viewing distance is too less. In some channels, you will literally see big blocks.
 
it was bad when i had tatasky with input given thru its composite(red white, yellow), much better with big tv either standard stb thru component or hd dvr thru hdmi, i use standard picture mode with little bit tweaking
 
@josedandrew : As per your information if 97% situation is covered, then i would be very happy to let go of the premium.

By the way, can anyone let me know the quality of SD content on C550. Due to screen size being 50", will there be any difference. Is it like less the size (40" LCD) , more the quality of SD ?

Please throw light on this issue.
vivekecm,
my suggestion would be, you demo both plasmas with SD content (dvd)
i am sure you won't find any difference with HD material between these two plasmas.
AFAIK, unless you move up series 7 or 8 you wont find major improvement in SD.:)
 
@Blasto, i will be demoing the sets in a week and post here my observations soon.

@josedandrew : As per your information if 97% situation is covered, then i would be very happy to let go of the premium.

By the way, can anyone let me know the quality of SD content on C550. Due to screen size being 50", will there be any difference. Is it like less the size (40" LCD) , more the quality of SD ?

Please throw light on this issue.

If by SD, you mean DVD video, they will look great.
If by SD, you mean DTH, they will look bad mostly. Best is the Big TV but even that is nowhere near the DVD quality and the quality is dependent on channel.
If you have a local cable wala connection, that will look better albeit the grains.

BTW, the above holds good for any TV. If the size is smaller, you will see lesser of the evil.. As they say, garbage in - garbage out!
 
Check the fotos in http://www.hifivision.com/television/13703-samsung-plasma-50-inch-full-hd-tv-ps50c550g1r.html from uzil's thread..

The first one shows reflection due to flourocent light which is mostly OK in viewing the TV.

The last one shows the black level in bars in flurecent light condition.

There is no example of a window right opposite to the TV. That would create worser reflections in the screen in the black areas.

I'm writing this because, your room has this window accross the TV.
 
Last edited:
If you have toomuch reflection use "Dynamic" mode in the daytime... It helps a bit with added colors...

I got blackout linings done for my curtains so room gets dark in the day time too.... ;)
 
@Blasto : Thanks for giving me the idea of how the set up of C550 would look like. Looks like i just need to get Big TV HD (Pity Samsung TVs come with Airtel HD) for somewhat better PQ. Or better still use the local cable connection. Since i have WD Live, content should not be problem.
@Kittu: Thanks for the tips to get better viewing experience in daytime. Looks like i have much redecorating work on my hands. Call u elaborate on the "Black lining" you mentioned earlier as i really dont have any clue what it might be. Some pics showing the same would be great. Perhaps u can PM me the details.
 
airtel hd should also be good,other dth forums rate airtel second to big tv only in pq and with a better sound quality better than big tv
i am sure it will be better than your cable if it is connected thru composite,
i had cable with cisco stb as well, i found that what matters is the connection- composite vs component/ hdmi

from above post it looks like u have a window across the tv, be aware that PQ of this set(for that matter any plasma ) will be not its best in high ambient light, my set is in a bedroom with good control over light
 
airtel hd should also be good,other dth forums rate airtel second to big tv only in pq and with a better sound quality better than big tv

They are bluffing obviously. I have SUN and Airtel and Sun has way better PQ. IMO, Airtel is inferior to Tatasky also.
 
Most certainly yes. To "pass judgement" in a public forum where people look for informed help, one most certainly needs to be qualified to "pass judgement". You are right, but only to the extent, that even a 'jack ass' (not directed at anyone in particular) can have an opinion, but that does not give him/her the right to "pass judgement" and that too when giving advise to other, unknowing and ignorant members looking for help. I personally have absolutely no issues with people expressing their opinions, no matter how uninformed they may be. Nor do I have any issues with them making correct/incorrect recommendations based on their opinions. But, what I do detest, is people passing judgements in the guise of preferences and thus further confusing people or even misleading them into believing things that are not factual.
First of all, I suggest you re-read my post again and maybe you might comprehend it better this time. In no part or words in my post, have I "told anyone to do or not to do anything". All i did was pose a simple question and that too not to you, but rather to 'pulsar_swift'. Now unless you are 'pulsar_swift or his/her personal assistant appointed by him/her to speak on his/her behalf, I suggest you mind your own business. Or "Are you (a) moderator? Or are you Paandoo Havaldar??" Are you personal secretary of OP, that you got so kicked that someone made an "incorrect recommendation"? Minding my business was all I was doing until I read your post, in which you (thinking you know everything) arrogantly questioned a member's qualifications for stating his personal opinion.

There are hundreds of threads on this forum, with thousands of posts discussing LCDs and the virtues of LCDs, but not once have I ever felt the need to respond to any of them. HAHAAHAHA you are in denial. GO through any LCD vs Plasma post and you will see your posts all over it. It is when people make ill informed posts using dated information or half truths about plasmas to justify their stand, that somehow LCDs are superior to Plasmas, that I feel it is neccessary to post, lest the op is confused or totally misled into a decision they may not have otherwise made. The OP is obviously going to demo the TVs before buying. It's not like he is going to run direct from his PC to the shop panting for plasma/LCD. As it is there are way too many TV salesman on this forum or atleast who talk like one, ie. with barely any actual knowledge about audio/video technology let alone actual quality, but still make all kinds of generalised statemnts and pass judgements in favor of the product they wish to push. THAT is what I want to know. What are your qualifications in passing such judgements?? What great knowledge is it that enables you to pass off others as having no actual knowledge about audio/vedio technology?? while you sit high up on your pedestal passing judgement. Are you a retired salesman, by any chance?
Again, I suggest that you re-read my post, I have in no way suggested that plasma burn-in is a myth. But the FACT is, that burn-in with current plasmas is almost a non issue, atleast beyond the initial 100-150 hrs of operation. Therefore passing judgement against plasmas for that reason and advising people accordingly is just plain wrong.
Well, considering that 'you' follow and believe all disclaimers/warnings printed in manuals, I suppose you should not buy a LCD TV too. After all quite a few LCDs come with disclaimers/warnings that there may be some dead pixels. Dead pixels can be checked at the time of buying.As a matter of fact, even an expensive and high end company such as Apple considers upto 'fifteen' dead pixels on their pricey 'Cinema Display' monitor, as "acceptable" & "normal" and therefore not fit for warranty repairs/replacement. If 'fifteen' dead pixels are acceptable on a 22" monitor, I wonder how many more would be considered "normal" in a 50" size. So much for the perfect LCD technology. You should buy one.

PS: I wont even get into the silliness, of following all disclaimers/warnings attached to various products. I won't even begin to harp on the pig-headedness of ignoring all disclaimers/warnings attached to various products.

Oh yeah, screaming in red, makes your point that much more valid, right? YESIn any case, since you seem to prefer idioms, but can't seem to comprehend the irony of using it in a post where you are doing exactly what you are accusing me of, (that's because I'm tired of reading your self-righteous posts in every LCD vs Plasma debate) here is one you hopefully can comprehend better "???? ??? ??? ??, ?? ???? ??? ??? ???". WAH WAH WAH!!! Not only are you plasma guru but you are also a philosopher as wellIronically, this idiom applies to the whole LCD vs Plasma debate too, wherein supporters of LCD TVs keep harping upon burn-in being the end of Plasma TVs.


P.S: Thnx for pointing out the omission of the innocuous article. I knew you could always rely on a "'jack ass' (not directed at anyone in particular)" to point out such faults.
 
Last edited:
Guys, plasma TV's will have less contrast ratio's why don't you try samsung 40c550 LCD.. I own this LCD and it's awesome... trust me, form more info about this LCD, pls. let me know..
 
@ sanjay0864: Baba, I said its my opinion. Opinion is different from judgment. Moreover why is this thread being turned in to a PLASMA vs LCD fight ? Do you own a PLASMA ?
I again restate my opinion, see this simple analogy, we had camera's which used films and now have digital camera's. Which one would you use ?
 
Today i got the time and opportunity to check out the LED, LCD and Plasma TV's at a big showroom here where all brands were neatly displayed. What totally blew me away was the 40C650. I have been wanting to take this TV without seeing till now, hence started the thread too in the first place. But after seeing the PQ of this TV, there is no doubt where my money would go. On seeing the 40C650, I immediately checked the version number and to my delight found it to be "SQ01" meaning its a Samsung Panel. No doubt it blew me away. None other models could come close except for Panny V20A. The salesman himself did not knew about the panel problem until i explained what can happen in this specific model. Perhaps Australia is safe from the Panel lottery problem. Almost same pricing as in India. Hope i can get hold of SQ panel back in India.
 
Do you own a PLASMA ?
Not sure, how this is relevant. But yes, I do own a Plasma. But then again, I also own a LCD.

see this simple analogy, we had camera's which used films and now have digital camera's. Which one would you use ?
I am sorry to say, but once again your basic premise is wrong. In your analogy, you are equating 'plasmas' with 'film' which is not correct. Simply because unlike 'digital' over 'film', LCDs do not offer any more functionality over plasmas. Also, unlike film, which has for all practical consumer purposes stopped from being further developed or promoted, whereas plasmas are still very much being developed and marketed. So although to answer you question, I use a digital camera. The same does not apply to plasmas or lcds and thus I would still buy both depending on my particular needs.
 
Buy from India's official online dealer!
Back
Top