Very true.It’s not very difficult to get a Patricia Barber to sound good but it’s a challenge to get old Bollywood to sound good. I enjoy that challenge
Thanks for correcting that, sir. We mostly take our own music with us for auditioning the speakers. The quote can be true irrespective of who said it.Just want to clarify that although this graphic has been floating around audiophilia for a while it is not true. Alan Parons never said this.
.
Well said Coaltrain! You've nicely articulated what i too was trying to convey.All music lovers are not audiophiles.
But all audiophiles started as music lovers.
So, the question should be: how much music lover is left in the audiophile that you now are?
Going by the responses here, some are more inclined to be audiophiles. They’re willing to forego music they may like, for music that sounds good on their systems.
Others are, first and foremost, music lovers. If the music they like sounds good on their systems, it’s a bonus.
I’m definitely in the latter camp.
Billie Holiday’s ‘Gloomy Sunday’, Jeff Beck’s ‘Blue Wind’, Coltrane’s ‘Afro Blue’, Tull’s ‘Slow Marching Band’ and countless other works of art will never sound ‘audiophile’ on any system.
But my life would be incomplete without them.
At the end of the day, I like the fact that both audiophiles and music lovers have music in common.
There’s no greater joy than discovering some new music you like. And both the aforementioned species can help you with that
All music lovers are not audiophiles.
But all audiophiles started as music lovers.
So, the question should be: how much music lover is left in the audiophile that you now are?
......
There’s no greater joy than discovering some new music you like. And both the aforementioned species can help you with that
My humble opinion is,
One who can enjoy the music with a simple set up even FM radio is a music lover.
One who has the ultra expensive setup but is still searching and upgrading for something better and better is an Audiophile.