Best Water Purifier

dmk

Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2010
Messages
59
Points
8
Location
saudi arabia later pondicherry
Hi
I am planning to buy a Water purifier for my new house.
I searched the web and found in india 3 brands are famous

1. Eureka forbes
2. Kent
3. Philips

Am Looking for Online Tap model

Any one have experience in the water purifier can help me to buy.

My Budget around 5000 to 8000 rupees.
 
dude every type of water purifier has diffrent things .. the old aqua gard used a ultra violet lamp and used to kill germs and filter water. same way kent is diff and philips..

however rather then spending money on water purifier drink boiled water thats gonna keep you and your family healthy in a long run.. no water purifier can do what boiling water does.. however if u still insist.

GO for RO(reverse osmosis) it works similar like our body does.. membrane that keeps germs away.. its close to 10k but best of the breed..
 
dude every type of water purifier has diffrent things .. the old aqua gard used a ultra violet lamp and used to kill germs and filter water. same way kent is diff and philips..

however rather then spending money on water purifier drink boiled water thats gonna keep you and your family healthy in a long run.. no water purifier can do what boiling water does.. however if u still insist.

GO for RO(reverse osmosis) it works similar like our body does.. membrane that keeps germs away.. its close to 10k but best of the breed..

Well, I dont know if I am correct. But about 3 years back called the aqua guard agent to our house to install the RO system. He carried out test of the water and told us that the RO can not be installed/not required. As per him RO is required for hard water only. If the mineral content in the water (which causes water to be hard) is not high then RO will cause water to be denuded of minerals and cause mineral deficiency in persons using it for prolonged duration.

In any case, what I know for sure is that RO system is slow and takes time to pour out water requiring water to be stored. The wastage of water is very high. About 2/3rd of water is taken out as waste. May be different for different water types.

Aquaguard eboiling+ claims water to be treated equivalent to boiling water.

If you heat water and use it-its definitely best. But time consuming process and needs expensive gas/electricity.
 
Whirlpool Reverse Osmosis. Not only is the device excellent functionally, the way they have designed the tap itself is beautiful. Great industrial design, great ease of use, good quality water, trouble free operation.

RO is a slow process, but purifiers like whirlpool (and even Kent and the others) have a storage tank to alleviate this problem, and therefore it's overall far more convenient to use an RO purifier than a regular UV or other purifier without a storage tank.
 
tauren what u stated is partially true however use of ro is not limited only to hard water it can be used anywhere.. also it does waste water but not 2/3 for say a glass of 300ml of water about 30 ml gets as waste.

also ro can be used anywhere and it does works just like a body cells and thin microscopic membranes work. our body does not stops minerals.. however less of minerals get recovered by fruits and food but how bout the germs we take ?

yes boiled water is time comsuming but biled water saves from major 30 types of water caused diseases.. however as i stated again if not boiled water.. go for the best.
 
Hi
dmk You go for aqua gad they are traditional. since past 7 years I have been using aqua grad. We can get good serves also.
 
If the mineral content in the water (which causes water to be hard) is not high then RO will cause water to be denuded of minerals and cause mineral deficiency in persons using it for prolonged duration.

Mineral content in water need not be high. Infact no minerals are needed.
Our body extracts essential minerals from other sources and not from water.
It is only a marketing gimmicik to say 'with added minerals'.
The best of purified water contains absolutley no minerals(eg, aquafina, bisleri,etc) Only those exotic mountain spring water like evain, etc which are collected directly from springs contain 'usefull' minerals.

The best way to decide on what water purification process to use, is give a sample of your 'source' to an authorised water testing lab and based on the results you can decide on the method needed. Don't trust the testing done by water purifying makers. They manipulate the results to suit the model they want to sell, like how the Eureka guy has told you.

If you are getting metrowater supply all that you need is a simple purifier like
'Pureit' or just boiling ( it's a bit costly but hasslefree)
 
Last edited:
Mineral content in water need not be high. Infact no minerals are needed.
Our body extracts essential minerals from other sources and not from water.
It is only a marketing gimmicik to say 'with added minerals'.
The best of purified water contains absolutley no minerals(eg, aquafina, bisleri,etc) Only those exotic mountain spring water like evain, etc which are collected directly from springs contain 'usefull' minerals.

The best way to decide on what water purification process to use, is give a sample of your 'source' to an authorised water testing lab and based on the results you can decide on the method needed. Don't trust the testing done by water purifying makers. They manipulate the results to suit the model they want to sell, like how the Eureka guy has told you.

If you are getting metrowater supply all that you need is a simple purifier like
'Pureit' or just boiling ( it's a bit costly but hasslefree)

I am may not be a scientist but let me correct you here. Water need not have high mineral content true.

Infact no minerals are needed.:eek: Have you ever tasted distilled water??
Just drink distill water for a week and you will know the importance of mineral water. Distill Water will never quench your thirst. I have stayed in mountains in snow bound area dependent on snow for water so I know it very well. :)

The agent was right in his logic but yes his test results might be subject to verification.

One thing is for sure that if you drink water with less mineral content (leave aside without mineral) you are going to fall sick.
 
One thing is for sure that if you drink water with less mineral content (leave aside without mineral) you are going to fall sick.

I don't know about snow clad places but here in chennai majority of the people drink bottled purified water. And as i said earlier the good brands with a proper ISI mark contain no mineral. In that case half of chennai should be sick by now.

I agree with you that minerals make the water taste better but water is not meant to be tasty. It is odourless and tasteless and that's why it is called 'pure water'

the problem with having minerals in drinking water is they will contain other harmful substances like lead, arsenic, etc. Maybe in villages and unpolluted places mineral water will contain more usefull minerals than harmful agents.
In cities and towns it's safer to drink pure water than mineral water.
just read this link when free Water quality information- minerals in drinking water beneficial?
 
I don't know about snow clad places but here in chennai majority of the people drink bottled purified water. And as i said earlier the good brands with a proper ISI mark contain no mineral. In that case half of chennai should be sick by now.

I agree with you that minerals make the water taste better but water is not meant to be tasty. It is odourless and tasteless and that's why it is called 'pure water'

the problem with having minerals in drinking water is they will contain other harmful substances like lead, arsenic, etc. Maybe in villages and unpolluted places mineral water will contain more usefull minerals than harmful agents.
In cities and towns it's safer to drink pure water than mineral water.
just read this link when free Water quality information- minerals in drinking water beneficial?

By the way did you see in the end of the link they are advertising their RO system!!! the thing from where the debate started. RO system removes minerals and they are justifying it. :D

You are right in saying that there is arsenic and lead which are harmful. In old days such kind of wells were not used.

R u sure that ISI mark bottles dont have minerals. I doubt that. Do they have any marking saying that?? IMO they have marking saying no ADDED minerals. Just check. I am learning a lot from u. :)
 
R u sure that ISI mark bottles dont have minerals. I doubt that. Do they have any marking saying that?? IMO they have marking saying no ADDED minerals. Just check. I am learning a lot from u. :)

If they say that their water contains no minerals they won't be able to sell even a single bottle.:)
It is because they do a 7 stage purification including RO. I have a TDS meter and i've checked. The bigger brands always have a TDS of less than 3. (To understand the purity, the TDS value of groundwater in mogappair, a sub-urban locality in chennai is 1400:D) TDS of evian is around 70.

My opinion is if you live in a place which has chances of water being polluted like chennai, it is better to drink water with no minerals.
But if you live in a pristine place still unaffected by development of industries/vehicles/etc go ahead and reap the benefits/taste of mineral water.
 
I use kent RO and it has uv as well as ro. Lot of water gets wasted but I have put a huge bucket under the sink and the rejected water from RO is used for washing clothes, cleaning floor or watering the grass in the lawn.
 
By the way did you see in the end of the link they are advertising their RO system!!! the thing from where the debate started. RO system removes minerals and they are justifying it. :D

You are right in saying that there is arsenic and lead which are harmful. In old days such kind of wells were not used.

R u sure that ISI mark bottles dont have minerals. I doubt that. Do they have any marking saying that?? IMO they have marking saying no ADDED minerals. Just check. I am learning a lot from u. :)

The bottom-line is that water quenches thirst, and food provides nutrition. Relying on water to provide nutrition - minerals etc is really a bad idea. If you want to live healthy by keeping your body topped up with all the necessary minerals, metals, etc., please eat fruits and vegetables (and seafood, depending on diet). They will provide all the minerals that our body needs.

Yes, mountain spring water contains dissolved minerals that played a part in keeping the people living in the hills healthy. But then, if I lived in the Himalayas, and had to walk up and down 10km a day and breathed unpolluted clean mountain air, I would probably be 10 times healthier even if I drank battery water!

However, this "mineral water" thing has been exploited as a marketing tool by bottled water companies and the benefits have been excessively exaggerated. How else can they charge a 2500% premium on a product? So, you have a bottle of Himalayan spring water that probably costs 1 rupee to bottle but actually costs 25 rupees because it has its own marketing campaign and because you get to drink water that actually has minerals dissolved in it! Sometimes, they even call it virgin water (and promptly increase the price, just as it happens in another old old profession)!

This is not to say that RO companies are behind in the game. They are playing the reverse strategy (ahem, the reverse osmosis strategy). They are convincing you that your tap water is so poisonous that you should, rather MUST, use a technology that is used by desert countries like Saudi Arabia to convert sea water into normal water. So, they run their own marketing campaigns and charge you tens of thousands of rupees to install their RO machines.

Best of all, I saw a food travel show that covered a restaurant in Spain (I think) where the head chef will pair the appropriate mineral water with your food selection. Needless to say, apart from their regular bar, they have a "water bar" containing a selection of fine assorted waters.

Edit: I just realized that even this has a reverse twist. New York has been known for a while now for having one of the finest municipal water quality (I can vouch for it - it is really good!). Apparently, a company called Tap'dNY is now bottling and selling New York municipal tap water! One of their captions - "No glaciers were harmed in making this water."
 
Last edited:
In Chennai and such areas, the water hardness is very high and there is a lot of salt and CaCO3 (Calcium Carbonate) content. In such cases, RO is better. Same applies to Delhi/NCR.

I live in Pune where the water is abundant and not hard at all. We use the simple AquaGuard. In fact Kent RO sales in Pune region hardly make a dent. If the water in your area is not hard/salty, don't even think of RO.

As far as some "offtopic" conversation on mineral water goes:

1. Yes. It is true that pure distilled water is hadly "satisfying".
2. Water must have some mineral content, if for nothing, to make it tastier.
3. Mineral water companies are abusing the psyche by stating "with added minerals". They are indeed taking us for a ride.
4. The quality of water at my home from Aquaguard is as good as any bottled water.
 
Get the Award Winning Diamond 12.3 Floorstanding Speakers on Special Offer
Back
Top