marsilians
Well-Known Member
1. The Digital Signal Processing in your Pre-Amp shoudl be >= AVR if you want good clarity when watching movies.
I'm not sure I understood this correctly. But the connection from my avr to stereo is analog connection. Its from the avr pre-out to pre-amp input thru rca cables. Where is the need for digital signal processing. As I said may be I'm not understanding this correctly.
If you see in the diagram that Sumit has attached, all your sources are being routed through the Pre-amp before they touch the speakers. This means that if you have a great source but crappy DSP in the pre-amp you will lose quality. On the corollary if you have a resonable source but a greap DSP in the pre-amp then you will have better listening experience. That the reason.
2. YOu will not have the centre channel for music (some DSPs do sound better if you have the right source).
I don't want this but If I needed it I could still play the cd thru my dvd player and get the various dsp effects.
Your statement is exactly the reason I was not sure why you even wanted the pre-amp in my first message. Since your seem to have better listening experience with the pre-, aren't you losing that ability if you use the DVD as the source transport?
All this to just not have the AVR on?
I think you should play around with the connections a bit more to see if the overall benefit is greater than the complexity in the connectoins as you are also introducing more components in the path which tend to distort the original sound.
In the end if you are happy, thats all that matters
If you are always happy with 2 channel listening without a sub then you are good to go.
Even for this, if I needed additional bass I could always connect my sub to the second pre-out of the pre-amp. I could set the avr to send the lfe signals to the fronts instead of the sub.
My prev. comment re: complexity applies to this combination as well!