sachu888
Well-Known Member
Joshua, I have started using RG174 for signal which you sent me. I have used it on my recent few builds. I found it very good and easy to work.
Regards
Sachin
Regards
Sachin
This must be 5.1 ch like this-The next one is for $120 fully assembled at door steps.
.
I did not find any degradation across full bandwidth. But yes BASS is optimal now. Actually HF became little prominent and thus given impression of less bass. Carefully listening it for 3 days with different sources I found bass guitar and drums are sounding tight and to the point. Still air decay of drum skin, HF metal instrument and guitar strings are more separable.Om, how do you find the bass with 20K linear pot? I understand that's what Salas recommends (20-25K linear). When I tried 20K linear, I found bass suffered. I reverted to 50K log and bass sounded better in my setup.
That's it! This is the last time I'm using CAT6 wires for internal wiring. I had been hearing crackling noise from my speakers and sometimes one channel goes off completely. I suspected all sorts of things and eliminated them one by one, but in the end reflowing solder on all internal wiring of the DCB1 did the trick. Next time I will stick to multi strand wires:sad:
+1 to that. I have been using Cat5 cables, not at all easy to work with, a little bend and it breaks. Very irritating!
Do let me know which multi strand wires you are gonna use.
Try the smd resistor based stepped attenuators available on ebay for ~$12. People have reported that they sound better than the Blue Velvets ?
http://m.ebay.com/itm/201231759625?nav=SEARCHAny link, please?