If DCS would have taken the constructive criticism of the reviewer which assuming may be genuine as a feedback to improve their product, then DCS would have garnered more respect rather than criticism.Details here -
Seems like a scummy company
This may be a marketing stunt too...Can't believe dCS is putting wrong information about their product on a legal threat. There is a limit to stupidity.
Looks like they haven't heard about the Streisand effect. Someone in that company needs to be fired from their job. Most probably that VP of marketing who was sending the threatening e-mails.
Its not doing them any good from the marketing perspective. In fact it is a whole lot of harm to their brand image.This may be a marketing stunt too...
BartokAnyone know Which DCS product did he review?
Anyone know Which DCS product did he review?
I heard this extensively prior to getting my previous Bricasti, and I heard the opposite of what the reviewer was criticizing it for and I don't agree with this reviewer either. However, I didn't like it - felt it to be forward, and moved on, preferring the Bricasti m1se which sounded more neutral while having similar resolution.Someone here must have heard the Bartok.
Any opinions?
Looks like dCS is trying to find a hole to crawl into.A statement from DCS - https://dcs.community/t/a-response-to-recent-claims-regarding-dcs/6722
A response - https://forum.headphones.com/t/dcs-response-and-story/23779
The only difference between dCS as a company and a bucket of sh*t is the bucket.
Its a company and like any company is impersonal. Some overzealous employee at a Sr level might have felt that flexing muscles is the right way and of course must be taken to task.
This does not mean the product is bad or all folks there are evil..if you like DCS makes sense to still buy it irrespective as to how this storm shapes up.