There is lot of confusion here in terms of incorrect usage of terminologies.
SD, HD, etc., are resolution terminologies used for display of a digital image. This is usually decided by the number of pixels on the screen and whether the image is being displayed as interleaved or in progressive mode.
NTSC, PAL/SECAM have actually nothing to do with digital images and thus nothing to do with SD or with HD. NTSC, PAL/SECAM are methodologies to transmit and receive TV images. This is a completely post-production exercise and has nothing to do with the original image quality.
If you go back to the film days, the film reel is the equivalent of an analogue system. So using terminologies such as SD/HD in film reel is not valid. Each frame in a film reel (or what is called film stock) is a photographic snap, and the resolution is measured by grains in the film.
Though the early days consisted of films that did not have enough grains per square inch, companies such as Eastman Kodak, Fuji and others started delivering film stock with extremely dense grains. The film stock of today, is, you will be surprised to learn, the equivalent to 7000P. Since most plastic deteriorates, most of the film stock is being converted to digital frames and stored as single snaps though scanning. Again you will be surprised to learn that the lowliest of the snaps, when properly converted and cleaned, is the equivalent of 2000P.
Digital films have yet a long way to go.
Cheers
I completely agree with you. I was referring to SD as equivalent of NTSC/PAL, thanks for clearing it for everyone. In old ages analog resolution was referred to as horizontal number of lines like 200 to 600 lines (max I saw in analog sources or a CRT TV). I am still unsure of the analog masters (other than films) which was used to broadcast. I still feel it was less than 720p (uncompressed).