elangoas
Well-Known Member
My two cents. The more absorption you setup the more speaker energy is lost so needs more headroom.
As @sound_cycle said, the BBA is only absorbing the freq (whichever is resonating / extending the decay time..) that has been already produced by the speaker..
Also a side effect will be the room will become hotter.
Didn't pay much attention to this.. Did read that absorbed energy is turned to heat.. If it induces heat, by how much would the room temperature increase?.. Just for clarity..
So start with a smaller thickness esp. In the ceiling and keep increasing till you have an optimal amount.
If smaller panels, then need to cover more area.. Will check the possibility.. Thanks..
I don't think you would need to do that much. I'd try chunky bass traps on the top corners alone before doing the full ceiling.
Ok.. I was checking the waterfall in 100Hz intervals from 10 - 500 Hz, did find few freq in 300+ ms decay time above 80Hz.. Hence was thinking thicker panels..Will share the waterfall metrics..
I used to have the backwall right behind the listening position. There is no option to BBA in that case, so you might need to try that too.
My listening position is also against backwall.. So, hard to have an BBA there.. May be 3 inches at best i can.. not more than that..
I have 8 4x2 feet 4" + 2" air gapped panels and that's all I need*. I do however run Dirac.
Thx for the info.. Would like to know the BBA density that you had used, also if the decay times has improved after adding the panels..