Thanks for your suggestions..
In your new design the driver is naked.
Actually, it is not that naked.
The driver is housed in a 36mm thick circular disc with rounding at the edges where the driver frame meets the disc. This is to act as a proper termination for the waveguide formed by the mid driver for the tweeter.
Here is the zoomed in pic of the relevant area of the cabinet
So the distance between the front and rear source just based on the above geometry is let's say atleast 30mm. The gap will anyway be filled with 50mm thick melamine foam rings as in by xps foam prototype.
This will give decreased efficiency.
Can you please explain what do you mean by efficiency in this context. Is it the efficiency of the implementation of the cardioid polar pattern?
Ideally, the distance should be 1/4wl of the highest frequency of operation of cardioid.
Can you let me know how the 1/4 wl rule is obtained in the context of cardiod implementation. Is that consideration to have roughly co-located sources so that when the dipole meets the monopole, we get cardioid?
Thus you should increase the distance after calculating it and put a 'spacer' on the rear to achieve it
So as per the 1/4wl rule, I will get cardioid working to approx 2800Hz. which is more than enough since
1) The driver would have started to beam by then and the polar pattern width narrows fast.
Here is a sim that shows how a flat piston approximation of the driver would behave w.r.t polar pattern width in the above type baffle.
Diffraction sim
Polar pattern (normalized) from above configuration
2) The intended crossover with the tweeter (of this coaxial driver) is around 2.5 kHz. Hence from there on, the tweeter will control directivity