- Joined
- Mar 11, 2010
- Messages
- 3,129
- Points
- 0
IN CONTINUITY OF DEMO NO.15, WE DID A SHORT SWAP OF DACS AS FM.VIKOMA WANTED US TO CONNECT HIS ODAC TO THE EXISTING CHAIN. WE FLEETINGLY HEARD IT FOR A PERIOD OF 3 ODD TRACKS SO IT WOULD NOT BE RIGHT TO COMMENT ON IT. IN THAT SHORT PERIOD THOUGH, I FOUND IT TO MAKE THE SOUND STAGE NARROW & OVERALL SOUND WAS ON THE DRY SIDE.
DEMO NO.16
SOURCE: NAD 515 CDP (COST: 23K)
AMP: NAD 356 (COST: 47K MINUS DAC CARD OPTION / 60K WITH DAC CARD)
SPEAKERS: PSB ALPHA B1 (COST: 16K)
CABLES: SOMMER ICS WITH AMPHENOL CONNECTORS + VDH SPEAKER CABLES
OBSERVATIONS:
WE DID A DAC TO DAC COMPARO BETWEEN THE ONE IN THE 515 CDP & THAT IN THE 356 AMP. DIFFERENCE WAS ALMOST NON-EXISTANT.
WARM SOUND, BASS SOUNDED UNNATURAL, VOCALS WERE PRETTY CLEAN. COLORATION SHOWING ITS PRESENCE.
MY VIEW:THE START OF THE NAD/PSB TYPE OF SOUND SIGNATURE, WHICH IS NOT TO MY LIKING. ON THE DAC FRONT, IF YOU ARE NOT HAVING MUCH CDS THEN BETTER TO SAVE THE 10K DIFF BETWEEN THE NAD5151 CDP & DAC CARD & BUY THE DAC CARD OPTION IN THE 356 AMP ITSELF(IF YOU ARE LOOKING AT NAD AMPS THAT IS). 356 AMP ON THE WHOLE IS NOT A BAD ONE, BUT NEEDS FAR BETTER SPEAKERS THAN PSB, TO MAKE IT PERFORM MINUS ADDED SPICE OF THE PSBS.
DEMO NO.17
SOURCE: NAD 515 CDP
AMP: NAD356
SPEAKERS: PSB ALPHA B1 IN A MODE & PSB IMAGINE MINI(COST:44K )
IN B MODE
CABLES: SOMMER ICS WITH AMPHENOL CONNECTORS + VDH SPEAKER CABLES
OBSERVATIONS:
COMPARING THE 2 SETS OF SPEAKERS IT GOES LIKE THIS:
ALPHA B1S: ON THE BRIGHTER SIDE OF THE 2, HAVE WIDER SOUNDSTAGE, WILL GIVE YOU LISTENING FATIGUE WITH HIGH VOLUME
IMAGINE MINIS: MUCH REFINED THAN THE APHA B1S, MORE REFINED, ON THE WARMER SIDE & SHARING MORE OF THE PSB HOUSE SOUND THAN ONE OF THE CHEAPEST SPEAKER OF THE PSB RANGE(ALPHA B1)
MY VIEW: IF YOU ASK ME, ID STILL GO WITH THE CHEAP (RELATIVELY IN PSB RANGE THAT IS) ALPHA B1S THAN ANY OF THE OTHER PSB SPEAKERS (SAVE FOR SYNCHRONY SERIES, BUT THEN THOSE ARE DAMN EXPENSIVE) THESE ARE FAR LESS COLOURED THAN THE IMAGE & IMAGINE SERIES & HENCE MY CHOICE FROM THE PSB STABLE.
DEMO NO.18
SOURCE: NAD 515 CDP
AMP: NAD356
SPEAKERS: PSB IMAGE T6 (COST:87K)
CABLES: SOMMER ICS WITH AMPHENOL CONNECTORS + VDH SPEAKER CABLES
OBSERVATIONS:
356 COULD EASILY DRIVE THE T6 TOWERS, CAN GO LOUD. REST THERE IS NOTHING MUCH TO WRITE ABOUT.
MY VIEW: COMPLETE OVERPOWERING OF THE LOWER FREQUENCIES, IT JUST GOES BOOM BOOM BOOM. IN SHORT, VERY IRRITATING.
WE NOW DECIDED TO DO AN IMPROMPTU DAC SHOOT-OUT BETWEEN THE BERESFORD CAIMAN GATORISED, ASUS ESSENCE 1 & NAD DAC INSIDE THE NAD 356 AMP. KEEPING THE REST OF THE COMPONENTS THE SAME AS DEMO NO.18, WE DECIDED TO FOCUS ON HOW MUCH CAN THE DAC MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN THE ABOVE SET UP.
DEMO NO.19
SOURCE: BERESFORD CAIMAN GATORISED / ASUS ESSENCE 1 / NAD DAC(INSIDE 356 AMP)
AMP: NAD356
SPEAKERS: PSB IMAGE T6
CABLES: SOMMER ICS WITH AMPHENOL CONNECTORS + VDH SPEAKER CABLES
OBSERVATIONS:
COMPARING THE 3 DACS WENT LIKE THIS:
NAD DAC: LIVELY, AIRY & ADDED SPARKLE TO THE MUSIC
ASUS ESSENCE 1: THE MUSIC SOUNDED MORE LAIDBACK THAN THAT PRESENTED BY THE OTHER 2.
CAIMAN GATORISED: MOST NEUTRAL PRESENTATION OUT OF THE 3
MY VIEW: AGAIN, ITS HIGHLY SUBJECTIVE AS TASTES DIFFER BUT MY PICK WAS THE CAIMAN AS I LIKED THE WAY IT PRESENTED THE MUSIC MORE THAN THE OTHER 2.
DEMO NO.20
SOURCE: MARANTZ SA7003(COST:60K, DISCONTINUED NOW)
AMP: NAD375 (COST: 1L)
SPEAKERS: PSB IMAGE T6 IN A MODE + PROAC 140 (COST:1.40L) IN B MODE
CABLES: WSS ICS + VDH SPEAKER CABLES + SOMMER SPEAKER CABLES (PRO AC) & SUPRA CLASSIC SPEAKER CABLES (PSB T6)
OBSERVATIONS:
AFTER HEARING THE PSB IMAGE T6 EARLIER, IT WAS PLAIN OBVIOUS WHAT THE AUDIENCE PREFERRED TO HEAR. YES, THE PRO AC 140S WON HANDS DOWN. THE PRO AC 140S DID EVERYTHING THAT MUCH BETTER THAN THE PSB IMAGE T6S. VIKI SUGGESTED THAT WE HEAR THE PSB IMAGE T6S WITH ANOTHER AMP AS HE FELT THAT THEY WOULD SOUND BETTER BUT THE AUDIENCE WAS IN NO MOOD TO GIVE THE IMAGE T6S ANOTHER CHANCE. CANT BLAME THEM THOUGH
MY VIEW: PRO AC 140S WHAT ELSE hyeah: WOULD LOVE TO HEAR THE PSB IMAGE T6S WITH A NON NAD AMP & GIVE THEM ANOTHER CHANCE, HOPE THAT HAPPENS SOON TILL THEN LETS GIVE THEM THE BENEFIT OF DOUBT.
LAST 5 DEMO COMPILATIONS TO GO, HOPEFULLY HAVE THEM READY FOR TOMORROW.
DEMO NO.16
SOURCE: NAD 515 CDP (COST: 23K)
AMP: NAD 356 (COST: 47K MINUS DAC CARD OPTION / 60K WITH DAC CARD)
SPEAKERS: PSB ALPHA B1 (COST: 16K)
CABLES: SOMMER ICS WITH AMPHENOL CONNECTORS + VDH SPEAKER CABLES
OBSERVATIONS:
WE DID A DAC TO DAC COMPARO BETWEEN THE ONE IN THE 515 CDP & THAT IN THE 356 AMP. DIFFERENCE WAS ALMOST NON-EXISTANT.
WARM SOUND, BASS SOUNDED UNNATURAL, VOCALS WERE PRETTY CLEAN. COLORATION SHOWING ITS PRESENCE.
MY VIEW:THE START OF THE NAD/PSB TYPE OF SOUND SIGNATURE, WHICH IS NOT TO MY LIKING. ON THE DAC FRONT, IF YOU ARE NOT HAVING MUCH CDS THEN BETTER TO SAVE THE 10K DIFF BETWEEN THE NAD5151 CDP & DAC CARD & BUY THE DAC CARD OPTION IN THE 356 AMP ITSELF(IF YOU ARE LOOKING AT NAD AMPS THAT IS). 356 AMP ON THE WHOLE IS NOT A BAD ONE, BUT NEEDS FAR BETTER SPEAKERS THAN PSB, TO MAKE IT PERFORM MINUS ADDED SPICE OF THE PSBS.
DEMO NO.17
SOURCE: NAD 515 CDP
AMP: NAD356
SPEAKERS: PSB ALPHA B1 IN A MODE & PSB IMAGINE MINI(COST:44K )
IN B MODE
CABLES: SOMMER ICS WITH AMPHENOL CONNECTORS + VDH SPEAKER CABLES
OBSERVATIONS:
COMPARING THE 2 SETS OF SPEAKERS IT GOES LIKE THIS:
ALPHA B1S: ON THE BRIGHTER SIDE OF THE 2, HAVE WIDER SOUNDSTAGE, WILL GIVE YOU LISTENING FATIGUE WITH HIGH VOLUME
IMAGINE MINIS: MUCH REFINED THAN THE APHA B1S, MORE REFINED, ON THE WARMER SIDE & SHARING MORE OF THE PSB HOUSE SOUND THAN ONE OF THE CHEAPEST SPEAKER OF THE PSB RANGE(ALPHA B1)
MY VIEW: IF YOU ASK ME, ID STILL GO WITH THE CHEAP (RELATIVELY IN PSB RANGE THAT IS) ALPHA B1S THAN ANY OF THE OTHER PSB SPEAKERS (SAVE FOR SYNCHRONY SERIES, BUT THEN THOSE ARE DAMN EXPENSIVE) THESE ARE FAR LESS COLOURED THAN THE IMAGE & IMAGINE SERIES & HENCE MY CHOICE FROM THE PSB STABLE.
DEMO NO.18
SOURCE: NAD 515 CDP
AMP: NAD356
SPEAKERS: PSB IMAGE T6 (COST:87K)
CABLES: SOMMER ICS WITH AMPHENOL CONNECTORS + VDH SPEAKER CABLES
OBSERVATIONS:
356 COULD EASILY DRIVE THE T6 TOWERS, CAN GO LOUD. REST THERE IS NOTHING MUCH TO WRITE ABOUT.
MY VIEW: COMPLETE OVERPOWERING OF THE LOWER FREQUENCIES, IT JUST GOES BOOM BOOM BOOM. IN SHORT, VERY IRRITATING.
WE NOW DECIDED TO DO AN IMPROMPTU DAC SHOOT-OUT BETWEEN THE BERESFORD CAIMAN GATORISED, ASUS ESSENCE 1 & NAD DAC INSIDE THE NAD 356 AMP. KEEPING THE REST OF THE COMPONENTS THE SAME AS DEMO NO.18, WE DECIDED TO FOCUS ON HOW MUCH CAN THE DAC MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN THE ABOVE SET UP.
DEMO NO.19
SOURCE: BERESFORD CAIMAN GATORISED / ASUS ESSENCE 1 / NAD DAC(INSIDE 356 AMP)
AMP: NAD356
SPEAKERS: PSB IMAGE T6
CABLES: SOMMER ICS WITH AMPHENOL CONNECTORS + VDH SPEAKER CABLES
OBSERVATIONS:
COMPARING THE 3 DACS WENT LIKE THIS:
NAD DAC: LIVELY, AIRY & ADDED SPARKLE TO THE MUSIC
ASUS ESSENCE 1: THE MUSIC SOUNDED MORE LAIDBACK THAN THAT PRESENTED BY THE OTHER 2.
CAIMAN GATORISED: MOST NEUTRAL PRESENTATION OUT OF THE 3
MY VIEW: AGAIN, ITS HIGHLY SUBJECTIVE AS TASTES DIFFER BUT MY PICK WAS THE CAIMAN AS I LIKED THE WAY IT PRESENTED THE MUSIC MORE THAN THE OTHER 2.
DEMO NO.20
SOURCE: MARANTZ SA7003(COST:60K, DISCONTINUED NOW)
AMP: NAD375 (COST: 1L)
SPEAKERS: PSB IMAGE T6 IN A MODE + PROAC 140 (COST:1.40L) IN B MODE
CABLES: WSS ICS + VDH SPEAKER CABLES + SOMMER SPEAKER CABLES (PRO AC) & SUPRA CLASSIC SPEAKER CABLES (PSB T6)
OBSERVATIONS:
AFTER HEARING THE PSB IMAGE T6 EARLIER, IT WAS PLAIN OBVIOUS WHAT THE AUDIENCE PREFERRED TO HEAR. YES, THE PRO AC 140S WON HANDS DOWN. THE PRO AC 140S DID EVERYTHING THAT MUCH BETTER THAN THE PSB IMAGE T6S. VIKI SUGGESTED THAT WE HEAR THE PSB IMAGE T6S WITH ANOTHER AMP AS HE FELT THAT THEY WOULD SOUND BETTER BUT THE AUDIENCE WAS IN NO MOOD TO GIVE THE IMAGE T6S ANOTHER CHANCE. CANT BLAME THEM THOUGH
MY VIEW: PRO AC 140S WHAT ELSE hyeah: WOULD LOVE TO HEAR THE PSB IMAGE T6S WITH A NON NAD AMP & GIVE THEM ANOTHER CHANCE, HOPE THAT HAPPENS SOON TILL THEN LETS GIVE THEM THE BENEFIT OF DOUBT.
LAST 5 DEMO COMPILATIONS TO GO, HOPEFULLY HAVE THEM READY FOR TOMORROW.
Last edited: