Very seriously thinking of having an DAC meet along with my Bryston DAC .
Very seriously thinking of having an DAC meet along with my Bryston DAC .
@John
I have not really detailed out why I chose the W4S DAC 2...
John, I have about 1000 CDs and close to 2000 LPs that I want to keep... there are 2-300 LPs that I have put away and am slowly selling... Now that being in the background, what I find is that I have not put on a CD more than 3-4 times in the last 3 years-- and that too when i have had audiophile guests who come over with their own CDs for a listen...
I have almost all the CD titles on Vinyl and prefer Vinyl to CD.
However, to say that I don't listen to a digital front end, or that I don't need one, would be a lie.
I do listen to a lot of FLAC... before making an investment on a new title on LP, I get the FLAC. Earlier I would burn the FLAC as a CD and play it through my CD player.
If I liked the album, I'd go an buy it on vinyl.
But this process got too tedious, and in my book very wasteful. As i would not listen to that particular CD again... that much of plastic wasted!
So, in comes the Logitech Squeezebox Touch with a Cambridge Audio Dac Magic...
All sampling started to happen via the SBT. While the SBT is great and convenient, it wont do better than the average CDP in the 50-60k range (tops)... and the DAC Magic coupling to it was of no use. The SBT's in built DAC was just as good.
Overall, I felt that i could do better... At another FM's place - CyberVinay, i undertood how PC + DAC can be a super solution.
So, I started exploring... I certainly did not want to spend an obscene amount of money on a DAC and PC as I'd rather utilise that money on optimising my Vinyl playback...
So, for PC, I brought in the services of my back-up Dell Laptop. Its a Core2 Duo Machine, with 3 GB Ram... (will be upgrading the RAM to 8 GB). And after a fair amount of auditioning I chose the W4S DAC 2...
There is one other DAC at the 1L price point that I quite liked and that is the Thyaga DAC from AP.
The W4S DAC 2 is just a touch better, however... Just a touch, mind.
Both these above mentioned DAC's stand head and shoulders above other Dac's in the sub 1L mark.
And I do not go by reviews... I like to make my own judgement as I have burnt my fingers way too many times in the past....
AFAIK AP's NOS DAC that I have is not a production model but only a one off piece. It has dual TDA 1541 chipa so can only do 16/44 and no hi rez but it suits me fine.
Sure Srini, let's do it. Tell me the date, time and venue.
Hey Manav
Have you tried the single ended out? Is there a quality difference? I am wondering how this will affect folks who do not do balanced.
I like my music this way too & when it comes to dac, and I've my eyes set on
Zodiac Gold 384 kHz DAC | Antelope Audio
with this PSU : Voltikus PSU | Antelope Audio
yes, the cost shoots to approx. Euro 3,595
but you get reference standards for that price.
Warmth? Use a graphic equaliser in software: it's free. In fact, you can distort your sound to your absolutely specific taste in software: I must find out how to get 1950s Radiogram sound so I can have a childhood-listening fest . Don't say this is impure, artificial, etc: isn't it how a lot of music was recorded in the first place?That warmth people talk about from a high performance turntable cartridge and phono section that they say digital can't do,
Antelope dacs are used by some of the finest studios whose finished material we buy, listen and get kicks from ..
yes they use this dac to get their job done. Am told its good. One is soon to arrive to me for trial / testing. will post feedback upon testing.
Hey Manav
From our last discussion, you were saying that you are using the balanced out from the W4S DAC. Have you tried the single ended out? Is there a quality difference? I am wondering how this will affect folks who do not do balanced.
@John
I have not really detailed out why I chose the W4S DAC 2...
John, I have about 1000 CDs and close to 2000 LPs that I want to keep... there are 2-300 LPs that I have put away and am slowly selling... Now that being in the background, what I find is that I have not put on a CD more than 3-4 times in the last 3 years-- and that too when i have had audiophile guests who come over with their own CDs for a listen...
I have almost all the CD titles on Vinyl and prefer Vinyl to CD.
However, to say that I don't listen to a digital front end, or that I don't need one, would be a lie.
I do listen to a lot of FLAC... before making an investment on a new title on LP, I get the FLAC. Earlier I would burn the FLAC as a CD and play it through my CD player.
If I liked the album, I'd go an buy it on vinyl.
But this process got too tedious, and in my book very wasteful. As i would not listen to that particular CD again... that much of plastic wasted!
So, in comes the Logitech Squeezebox Touch with a Cambridge Audio Dac Magic...
All sampling started to happen via the SBT. While the SBT is great and convenient, it wont do better than the average CDP in the 50-60k range (tops)... and the DAC Magic coupling to it was of no use. The SBT's in built DAC was just as good.
Overall, I felt that i could do better... At another FM's place - CyberVinay, i undertood how PC + DAC can be a super solution.
So, I started exploring... I certainly did not want to spend an obscene amount of money on a DAC and PC as I'd rather utilise that money on optimising my Vinyl playback...
So, for PC, I brought in the services of my back-up Dell Laptop. Its a Core2 Duo Machine, with 3 GB Ram... (will be upgrading the RAM to 8 GB). And after a fair amount of auditioning I chose the W4S DAC 2...
There is one other DAC at the 1L price point that I quite liked and that is the Thyaga DAC from AP.
The W4S DAC 2 is just a touch better, however... Just a touch, mind.
Both these above mentioned DAC's stand head and shoulders above other Dac's in the sub 1L mark.
And I do not go by reviews... I like to make my own judgement as I have burnt my fingers way too many times in the past....
1. Benchmark DAC1 USB.
In that case, the price may well be justified by the build quality and...square_wave said:Antelope audio is a well known engineering focused company with a very good presence in the pro audio world.
There are folks who spent many times more on digital front ends.
Hi,
I know this topic has been discussed a lot, still would like to get a fresh opinion from you guys .
What do you guys think about spending $500-1000 for a DAC. I have the Oppo-93 BDP and wanted to use that as my CDP and media player (for FLACs from my HDD). Now the DAC in the Oppo-93 is just mediocre. I thought a lot between Oppo-95 and Oppo-93 before buying Oppo-93. I thought with Oppo-93, I can add a DAC to improve the stereo performance...
...Is there any 384khz music? If there is, can anybody (blind, mind you!) tell? Oh, and if you have your heart set on that you have to buy a Mac to get it...
Garbage in, garbage out. Since most of the commercially available music would be digital in the future, I would try to get the best possible DAC for my system. Based on a lot of user reviews, I'd go for a Saber ES9018 based DAC. Out of the options mentioned here, I'd choose the M-DAC (or a CD8200CD/Q) because it uses the Saber chip and it's designed by John Westlake, the designer of Pink Triangle's DaCapo, Cambridge Audio's DACMagic, CD4, CD4SE, CD6, DAC 123, ISO Magic among others. The W4S DAC would be my next option. If I am ready to splurge more than $4000, I'd probably scout for a good deal on a used AKM-based mid-level Esoteric DAC/CDP with a digital-in. However, have you given any thought about DIY? The TPA Buffalo 3 (and the upcoming 3SE) would be a very good option to consider.
Here's a multi-part link that discusses the Audiolab CD and DAC products in length:
At last... (Audiolab) - part I - pink fish media
At last... (Audiolab) - part II - pink fish media
At last... (Audiolab) - part III - pink fish media
At last... (Audiolab) - part IV - pink fish media
At last... (Audiolab) - part V - pink fish media
A resolution that high is usually used for studio masters, I think. I could be wrong about the exact benefits of sampling music that high, but I understand that it may give more headroom when mastering dynamic music, like classical for instance. Here are some of the places I know that sell 352.8kHz/24-bit audio tracks:
High Resolution Music DOWNLOAD services .:. FLAC in free TEST BENCH
HIGHRESAUDIO | Home of audiophile music
Ofcourse, like the CPU clockspeed-race of yore, the 'KHz' may not mean much for most of the music that would be peddled, but it just might be worth it on atleast some music...