square_wave
Well-Known Member
I think venkat pretty much nailed it.I heard the DartZeel amplifier a long time ago amplifying music from both a turntable and from digital sources. That really shook the foundation of what I thought were good amps. The speakers were hand made single driver and multi driver speakers.
Recently, I listened to the McIntosh driving McIntosh speakers. The source was completely digital using a networked Plex server.
The difference? Hard to describe.
McIntosh was full bodied, pushing the music hard into your face. At the same time, it created a huge soundstage and ensured you heard every voice and instrument with clear separation and placement. Clarity is something that came through clearly. The background was black and it ensured you heard even the tiniest of sound.
DartZeel, on the other had, enveloped you in the music. It never pushed anything at you. At the same time, you could visualize the soundstage, the singers and the instruments easily. With familiar numbers, you could literally know what voice or instrument is going to come - where, and when. It made you yearn for the sound and heave a sigh of relief when you did hear it. That is the kind of involvement it forced on you.
Both have their positives. Any Negatives? I am not sure. But both are systems you could live with happily.
Cheers
@Decadent_Spectre , the difference between the 2 systems is on similar lines. With audionote it was all about the connection with the musicians. Microdynamics are abundantly clear. The tone of the sound makes you connect with the music emotionally. However large scale orchestras were more convincing on the MAC / SF system in terms of scale. End of the day, it is all a matter of taste.
A system I heard that walked a balance between these 2 opposites but offered even greater dynamics and scale were the fyne f702 on sim audio moon 40th anniversary edition gear. But that is a different story altogether.