Friends,
I got a chance to look at the acoustic design of Oakley' theater room. To me it looks like a highly professional design. The design looks well thought through and has acoustic panels placed only at the necessary places in the room. It has got all the basic components like absorbers, diffusers and traps placed at the right places and not all over the room. Now I completely get what Oak meant by making a room completely "dead" by padding the room completely. Even I was told by a few of my audiophile friends in US and Jacob George from Rethm regarding making the room appropriately "live" rather than completely making them "dead" by padding it all around. Oak's design follows the above principle and the acoustic panels are placed based on calculating the reflection and reverberation caused by a 7.2 speaker setup.
Oak, please correct me if I wrote some blunders. The feedback I wrote is based on my limited knowledge on the acoustics
.
Thanks,
John.
He indeed is. So as others who are contributing to this thread
. Man I am learning a lots of stuff from this forum :clapping:
Thanks for the detailed post. We were able to visualise the HT through your eyes
Yes, there are many knowledgable members here and I have learnt a lot from all of them and this has helped me in my DIY. To me, you too are quite knowledgable as you have interpreted the design and understood what a professional had in mind
.
Based upon your comments, it appears that Mr Oakley is knowledgeable.
May not be him, but the professional who has done the room seems knowledgable (I have not seen the pic or design, but trust John's judgement).
The professional has plotted reflective points for a 7 channel system and treated it accordingly :clapping:. In a home theater, with multiple seats and multiple speakers (7 speakers in this case), one will be left with less than 20 percent of side walls which are not reflective points even if you take all the good seats in the room into consideration. This IMO is the reason why many people cover the entire wall (I have covered upto 4ft height) with absorbent material and this works well for HT. Some others use diffusors, helmholtz resonators etc but thats upto the enthusiast as to how far one wants to go.
Wouldn't it be much better if he'd also be constructive in his criticism?
+1, constructive criticism is welcome and forum etiquette needs to be followed to participate in a discussion forum.
Friends, quoting the above post for above mentioned thread.
I had sent pm to mr.square wave and offered him a audition. He didn't respond.
I don't know why mr.santosh is curious to know my whereabouts, use words like dodge as if I owe him something or to any one else.
Friends you mean, that for every post we do, we need to post mandatory pix?
It's ones discretion to show of his setup.
Mr John, had sent me pm for the design, which I have obliged.
I will definitely not post any design on any forum, if any wants to see how my design looks are welcome to pm.
Oak, I am not interested in your co-ordinates nor in PMing you for details of your design. If you have a great Home Theater, good for you!! If you choose to criticise other people's system/room, be prepared to answer questions about your knowledge or regarding your identity. We are not interested in knowing who you are, just whether you are real. It is easy to google and type away using an anonymous handle. This forum has seen too many fakes, some even posted pics of systems that did not belong to them.
In God we trust, everyone else bring data
On final note, for those going for dedicated listening and ht rooms, suggestion would be to take help of a pro.
Oak
It is not easy but still very much DIYable if one has the interest to learn and execute it. There are plenty of resources available on the internet including HFV where people have done it. Some may choose to DIY, some others may hire a professional. Nothing wrong with either approaches.