Is it just me or the panasonic(first) image looks the best out of those three . The sony looks washed out.
well i can live with a bit washed out image then a tv which doesnt show the details .
Is it just me or the panasonic(first) image looks the best out of those three . The sony looks washed out.
once again i persist with my distaste for using still images to judge televisions....i don't think anything can be achieved by looking at these images. A side-by-side comparison of these TVs is probably the only reliable way to judge these things.
yes all models have inbuilt upscalers,well what i have noticed is that of the affordable dvd players pioneer does a good job and sony ps3 upscale better then mosts tv out there via hdmi.
yes the tvs can upscale the image via composite as well but it wont look good compared to the image upscaled via HDMI.now days some of the upscaling dvd players comes wit a free HDMI cable.
also check this out hitachi upcoming upscaling tech .
Hitachi makes like Toshiba and touts "super resolution technology" - Engadget
Do they all have 100 Hz refresh rate?
I doubt abt Sony,they don't mention.
Secondly do sony 32w400A(India) is same as 32w4000(uk)?
bcos reviews are available for w4000
Now sony uk has anounced w4500 series having 100 hz.
I have seen following LCDs with their prices:
1. Philips-42PFL7432 Rs53990
2. Philips-37A2800 Rs44990
3. Samsung-32A450 Rs40000
4. Samsung-37A450 Rs56000
I want to buy minimum 37 inch LCD but SAMSUNG costs too much Rs56,000 in that much amount I can get Philips full HD 42 inch for RS54000
Samsung 4 series is not full HD....
Can anybody suggest for which one I should go from above mentioned models ?
Thanks,
Navin