Mouser.inFrom where can we purchase Neutrik Rean 373 RCA plug. Not available on amazon.
Surprising that they're unavailable on amazon. You can get them at lamington road specifically Cherry Automations (08048956693/09920929658)From where can we purchase Neutrik Rean 373 RCA plug. Not available on amazon.
Kiran Sales, +91 93222 35353. They will ship anywhere.From where can we purchase Neutrik Rean 373 RCA plug. Not available on amazon.
Lamington road ,Mumbai.From where can we purchase Neutrik Rean 373 RCA plug. Not available on amazon.
Did you source the Rean 373-2 rca plugs ? Have you got a quote incase you have enquired ? If not, then i could give you the contact details of a dealer in Chennai with the best prices as far as I've checked. He deals with Belden, Wyrestorm, Neutrik, Norden, Dlink and a few other brands.From where can we purchase Neutrik Rean 373 RCA plug. Not available on amazon.
Why not share the contact details here; like other FMs did!!Have you got a quote incase you have enquired ? If not, then i could give you the contact details of a dealer in Chennai with the best prices as far as I've checked. He deals with Belden, Wyrestorm, Neutrik, Norden, Dlink and a few other brands.
Yes . surely.....(somehow missed this request) .Why not share the contact details here; like other FMs did!!
There is no reason it should not be possible as long as you have 3 signal carrying wires you can make a balanced cable...but i guess a Balanced cable will be cheaper than 2 runs of a single ended ? using 2 cables will end up as a really thick IC !Great to find a thread dedicated to ICs with so many brilliant minds in here. So as always I come with a question -
1. Is it possible to make a balanced cable out of 2 unbalanced cables? I understand 2 core for XLR & 1 for coax (minimum); so if we use 2 unbalanced cables, for example 2 runs of a Mogami 2497 & use the cores for the 2 live connections and solder the shield on both for ground for an xlr. Wouldn't that be a balanced cable?
2. If it is are there any reasons why this practice is not common? Is this supposed to cause issues?
**I did ask Ali & he did say - it isn't possible, & I didn't want to bug him further, hence came here for more elaborate explanations.
Thanks!
Thanks @arj - Logically yes, it doesn't make sense. I was wondering if technically there could be any issues. I have been conducting some measurements under an Fm's guidance. So far looks promising.Balanced cable will be cheaper than 2 runs of a single ended ? using 2 cables will end up as a really thick IC !
technically possible, but not a good practice. The common cable from each of the 2-core cable which will be the ground on XLR may cause interference as they will be running parallel with termination at each end.Great to find a thread dedicated to ICs with so many brilliant minds in here. So as always I come with a question -
1. Is it possible to make a balanced cable out of 2 unbalanced cables? I understand 2 core for XLR & 1 for coax (minimum); so if we use 2 unbalanced cables, for example 2 runs of a Mogami 2497 & use the cores for the 2 live connections and solder the shield on both for ground for an xlr. Wouldn't that be a balanced cable?
2. If it is are there any reasons why this practice is not common? Is this supposed to cause issues?
**I did ask Ali & he did say - it isn't possible, & I didn't want to bug him further, hence came here for more elaborate explanations.
Thanks!
Thanks, any other issues we can come across? also what if I use a different cable as ground - lets say a finolex single core. That should not encounter such an issue, then what kind of issues are we looking at.technically possible, but not a good practice. The common cable from each of the 2-core cable which will be the ground on XLR may cause interference as they will be running parallel with termination at each end.
Just get a 3-core cable (one of it shield).Thanks, any other issues we can come across? also what if I use a different cable as ground - lets say a finolex single core. That should not encounter such an issue, then what kind of issues are we looking at.
Interference with what? Causing what?technically possible, but not a good practice. The common cable from each of the 2-core cable which will be the ground on XLR may cause interference
What about store bought XLR's? Same, no?as they will be running parallel with termination at each end.
Now the shield is running parallel to hot/cold AND is terminated at both ends too.Just get a 3-core cable (one of it shield).
it can act as an antennae. That is why it is not recommended to use a 3-core to terminate an RCA as-well.Interference with what? Causing what?
The hot and cold wires of a balanced cable are twisted together, and this twist is responsible for rejecting common mode noise that the balanced cable carries, or may be induced externally. The twist, coupled with the shielding, makes a balanced cable fairly immune to noise and allows very long runs. If noise immunity is important your experiment may not be the optimal solution. But have fun experimenting!Great to find a thread dedicated to ICs with so many brilliant minds in here. So as always I come with a question -
1. Is it possible to make a balanced cable out of 2 unbalanced cables? I understand 2 core for XLR & 1 for coax (minimum); so if we use 2 unbalanced cables, for example 2 runs of a Mogami 2497 & use the cores for the 2 live connections and solder the shield on both for ground for an xlr. Wouldn't that be a balanced cable?
2. If it is are there any reasons why this practice is not common? Is this supposed to cause issues?
**I did ask Ali & he did say - it isn't possible, & I didn't want to bug him further, hence came here for more elaborate explanations.
Thanks!
It's dedicated ground; if it's an antenna, so be it.it can act as an antennae. That is why it is not recommended to use a 3-core to terminate an RCA as-well.