Need your valuable suggestions (as usual) to finalize a pair of towers for my brand new marantz PM7004. I auditioned several speakers (Polk audio, Aviano 6, Heco, MA M4, Dali Zensor, EPOS M16i, EPIC 5, warf 9.5, 9.6,10.6..over the last month and a half..
I mainly listen to indian film music and little bit of western. Primary liking is towards rich bass and treble and I like bright sound.
Above all the speakers that I have auditioned, within the 35 K bugdet,I liked the warf Diamond 9.5 the best and then the MA M4. Rest of them were either beyond budget or I did not appreciate their sound signature for my taste of music.
Knowledgeable folks pls advise:
1) will the MA M6 (which is in the same price range 35-36 k as that of warf 9.5 - I am yet to audition this) will this speaker be better for my kind of listening than the warf 9.5? ie, delivering better bass and other details?
2) The MA M6 having 3+1 drivers, will this deliver a better bass and details compared to warf 9.5? To be honest, it was difficult to tell the diff betwen warf 9.5 and M4 (except that warf sounded good at relatively higher volume)
3) will the PM 7004 be sufficient enough to drive the MA M6? 9.5 sounded better only at relatively higher volumes.
4) I have an onkyo SR TX 607 which I will use with the tower speakers that I will buy. If M6 is an option with Marantz for stereo listening, will this match with onkyo? I am planning to use the pre out of onkyo to feed into Marantz so that the front speakers can be used for both stereo as well as HT.
5) If I choose M6, should I necessarly choose only monitor centers or can I go with warf center which are in the same price range? will they perform well as a team? I will be using my sony bookshelves for sorround.
Although I am yet to audition the M6 with my amp, mentally I am inclined to go with M6 as against warf 9.5 because of
1) better looks:lol:
2) higher sensitivity as compared to warf
3) 2 mid bass drivers and 1 for deep bass (as specified in the specs) as I like relatively heavier bass
4) Since I liked M4, I am assuming that M6 must be even better.
The warf dealer says that the warf's cones are much superior compared to any other brand but MA has polypropelene base. Not really sure whether this should be of concern.
I am planning to audition only the M6 and will have to decide between these
2 only as my budget is limited to 35k for the FS and need another 10-13 K to add a good front speaker.
Any suggestion/help/comments/advise..highly appreciated.
Thanks
Shiva
I mainly listen to indian film music and little bit of western. Primary liking is towards rich bass and treble and I like bright sound.
Above all the speakers that I have auditioned, within the 35 K bugdet,I liked the warf Diamond 9.5 the best and then the MA M4. Rest of them were either beyond budget or I did not appreciate their sound signature for my taste of music.
Knowledgeable folks pls advise:
1) will the MA M6 (which is in the same price range 35-36 k as that of warf 9.5 - I am yet to audition this) will this speaker be better for my kind of listening than the warf 9.5? ie, delivering better bass and other details?
2) The MA M6 having 3+1 drivers, will this deliver a better bass and details compared to warf 9.5? To be honest, it was difficult to tell the diff betwen warf 9.5 and M4 (except that warf sounded good at relatively higher volume)
3) will the PM 7004 be sufficient enough to drive the MA M6? 9.5 sounded better only at relatively higher volumes.
4) I have an onkyo SR TX 607 which I will use with the tower speakers that I will buy. If M6 is an option with Marantz for stereo listening, will this match with onkyo? I am planning to use the pre out of onkyo to feed into Marantz so that the front speakers can be used for both stereo as well as HT.
5) If I choose M6, should I necessarly choose only monitor centers or can I go with warf center which are in the same price range? will they perform well as a team? I will be using my sony bookshelves for sorround.
Although I am yet to audition the M6 with my amp, mentally I am inclined to go with M6 as against warf 9.5 because of
1) better looks:lol:
2) higher sensitivity as compared to warf
3) 2 mid bass drivers and 1 for deep bass (as specified in the specs) as I like relatively heavier bass
4) Since I liked M4, I am assuming that M6 must be even better.
The warf dealer says that the warf's cones are much superior compared to any other brand but MA has polypropelene base. Not really sure whether this should be of concern.
I am planning to audition only the M6 and will have to decide between these
2 only as my budget is limited to 35k for the FS and need another 10-13 K to add a good front speaker.
Any suggestion/help/comments/advise..highly appreciated.
Thanks
Shiva