This is the first post in 9 pages that is relevant. Thanks Nikhil! Will try to understand what is said in the article.
If you really feel that all of your co-forumite's experiences, theories and opinions are irrelevant, I wonder why you asked? There are some people on this forum that seem to throw out silly-cable stuff and then sit back and wait for the fun. I
do not think that is what you did: I think your enquiry was genuine. But if your enquire, you can't, surely, complain about getting answers. No answers would be cause for complaint.
As for
external references, already you have (at least, this is off the top of my head)...
Audioholics, a low-bull hifi site, publishing an article from BlueJeans Cables about why they don't even sell power cables. Negative, but very
relevant.
Lampizator, a very audiophile hand built tube component manufacturer's article. Negative, but covers new ground with a very practical and low-cost RFI filter.
...and probably more...
Perhaps the word you were looking for was
positive, rather than
relevant? That's easy: name a cable manufacturer that sells this stuff, go to their site, and you can find (if you choose to believe them) plenty of reasons
why you should buy fancy, exotic, expensive power cables. They'll be happy to sell, you'll be happy to buy. Smiles all around

hyeah:
Do you find Kanwar's posts relevant? I could understand it if anybody finds him a but
blunt 
for their tastes, although a bit of bluntness is, to me, very welcome in this world of rhodium-plated fairy-dust, but never mind his style, my style or anybody else's style --- he is a pro-audio amplifier designer and manufacturer. If an engineer's point-by-point answers to the marketing claims are not relevant, then what is?
Which brings an idea to my mind...
How many of our respected high-end component manufacturers also make, market and sell cables? Not many?
I wonder why not!
.