I completely understand your stand. And your belief. I am not trying to change that......not am I challenging your ears. (Golden or not

)
Veterans like you are in a different game. However lesser mortals like me, tend to look for 'value of performance'. I am a cheapo - who seeks the best performance from the lowest of costs.
Electronics and audio technology has a well established decades of research. And most of the pro-world knows this as their basis of manufacturing.
The hi-fi world also knows the reasearch but tends to play them down as in this niche market, aesthetics, and subjectivity are more stronger marketing factors then pure audio fidelity. Hence the perpetuated myths and reliance on ears (which psychoacoustics has established the fallibility in many ways).
Humans prefer a certain curve of audiospectrum. This has been established by many studies and the research is very clear.
It's actually not a.mystery why hi-fi world is like this. There are huge profits to be reap from this market. There are billionaires who doesn't flinch to buy for 'their ego'.
Somehow I am baffled when these kind of discussion moors into personalised attacks. I only want some discussion of merits. And it is also a big enigma that
instead of flaying manufacturers which lies through their teeth and asking their accountability and ethical practice, the discussion veers into personal experiences (the lack of it or abundance of it). I fear to imagine the application of notions of hi-fi in gun development.
And since some snarky remarks are made here, can I respectfully retort - no one is forced to comment on this thread. If one does not like the perspective shared, move on. As much as some of us revere high expensive devices as the better performing ones, the same reverie for us are those devices which are cheapo but perform better. For me my enthusiasm is that SOTA devices are comming to affordable levels....and one need not sell a kidney to own a SOTA amp/DAC for the love of the hobby.