did you update your signature to align with the situation?Really good to see this, especially since this is spread by word of mouth with apparently excellent customer service.
I had it for long time from almost 10 years backdid you update your signature to align with the situation?
I'm not sure that's the right justification or approach but won't delve further; especially in the wake of few other FMs already put across what I had to say.I think that's one thing which might not look good due to the manufacturing process. These front fascia and sides are using laminates than vinyl like most of the speakers do. Laminates are hard, non flexible and durable. but if you want to make a countersink, the clearance it needs for the speaker to sit flush have a minute chance of the edge showing up.
As a DIY guy and a speaker designer myself, I would take this approach as this is more consistent in result and give higher yield. The crossover should have taken care of the edge diffractions that should occur!
Discussing with Amit would be a good idea. If anything, it would atleast improve our awareness about design choices made while designing these speakers and therefore enhance our collective wisdom. I guess that would also motivate the company to do a rethinking/address the kind of issues we have talked about, if required and if possible. Either way, we stand to benefit as customers.I believe dropping an email to Amit/IndiQ on the reasons for surface mounting would be more fruitful.
Also correct me if I am wrong, the Dynaudio M20 also seem to be surface mounted as per my understanding which I gained thanks to the discussions here & M20 do not seem to have any treble heaviness , infact they are quiet the opposite.
Discussing with Amit would be a good idea. If anything, it would atleast improve our awareness about design choices made while designing these speakers and therefore enhance our collective wisdom. I guess that would also motivate the company to do a rethinking/address the kind of issues we have talked about, if required and if possible. Either way, we stand to benefit as customers.
As per what knowledgeable designers often point out in other forums, a good speaker should be have strategies put in place to avoid diffraction such as offset tweeter, waveguided tweeter, rounded/beveled baffle edges (low diffraction baffles) etc. More are described in the heismann acoustics link that i had shared in a previous post.
If the treble heaviness that i mentioned has caused a confusion, i didnt say that it was caused specifically by edge diffraction. I made a remark about the overall tonality of the speaker as per what i felt which could be influenced by the positioning and recording done in the youtube video. Again i understand that YouTube videos are not the right way to judge sound quality of a speaker. So i wouldnt go more on that direction. However if even users of this speaker have felt that it is a bit treble heavy, it has got more to do with the "voicing" of the tweeter via the crossover. A designer has has lots of ways to attenuate frequencies in the treble range so I wont go into its details either. Even toeing in speakers will also alter their treble balance due to effects of tweeter directivity. Due to all this, i wouldnt also comment about the techinical aspects behind relative treble balance of dyanaudio speakers (since i havent listened to them and also doesnt know the drivers & the resulting response due to their interaction with the crossover). In this day and age, if tweeters are still surface mounted, i don't know of any other reason than to cut costs/designer doesnt care about that aspect, irrespective of company that makes the speaker.
I believe dropping an email to Amit/IndiQ on the reasons for surface mounting would be more fruitful.
Instead of multiple FMs privately interacting with him, it may be better that he engages all the FMs in this very thread. Wish someone requests him accordingly.Discussing with Amit would be a good idea. If anything, it would atleast improve our awareness about design choices made while designing these speakers and therefore enhance our collective wisdom. I guess that would also motivate the company to do a rethinking/address the kind of issues we have talked about, if required and if possible. Either way, we stand to benefit as customers.
Why don't you consider replying to the posts made by FM @keith_correa who comes across (to me at least) as very knowledgeable in this regard?As per what knowledgeable designers often point out in other forums, a good speaker should be have strategies put in place to avoid diffraction such as offset tweeter, waveguided tweeter, rounded/beveled baffle edges (low diffraction baffles) etc.
I remember that ‘face-off’ thread of yours. Some of us had felt (based on the samples you posted - appreciable work!) that the Elacs sounded much better. To me, they sounded more refined and less boxy than the Indiq speakers there. Now, with the technical discussion in this thread, I can see what might have contrubuted to that.I have had opportunity to compare the Indiq Speakers with some well know and highly hyped brands and these stood out completely.
May be, may be not. A highly favourable Price/value ratio and exemplary Customer orientation could also have been significant contributors.The fact that 30 to 40 odd members have purchased the Indiqaudio speakers in the last year and a half is the biggest testament to its sound quality.
I remember that ‘face-off’ thread of yours. Some of us had clearly felt (based on the samples you posted - appreciable work!) that the Elacs sounded far better. To me, they sounded more refined and less boxy than the Indiq speakers there. Now, with the technical discussion in this thread, I can see what might have contrubuted to that perception.
May be, may be not. A highly favourable Price/value ratio and Customer orientation could also have been significant contributors.
Many companies like Dynaudio employ both Electrical and Physical time alignment. Their tweeters are usually offset by a step back from the woofer.hence the question on the actual impact of not following a flush mounting technique as designers for age-old brands like Dynaudio still ignore the fact then it does bring some thought on why they dont follow the approach and actual benefits of using the approach vs it being just a more labor intensive process.
Many companies like Dynaudio employ both Electrical and Physical time alignment. Their tweeters are usually offset by a step back from the woofer.
With the limited knowledge I have, I fully agree to FM @keith_correa's opinions in this thread. I dont claim to know a correct way to go about designing speakers. There could be speaker models, whose design is driven by what eventually the room is going to do to it. But, while designing conventional boxed loudspeakers, given the freedom (budgetwise), one should try to mitigate mostly addressible problems that shows up higher up in the audible range (not talking about low frequency artifacts here) such as edge diffraction caused either by tweeter mounting or due to sharp baffle edges. We shouldn't be leaving it to the mercy of the room to take care of the peaks and dips in the frequency response that we have created either due to driver selection or in crossover design. This is because room behaviour is very hard to predict with multiple objects in it. Every reflection that is caused by an object in the room causes comb-filtering, which causes peaks and nulls depending on the path length traversed. With reflections from all objects and surfaces combined, it can cause significant variations in the frequency response. Hence every room is different. If a speaker doesnt take steps to address diffraction issues, it could be cost cutting but i dont know by how much.Instead of multiple FMs privately interacting with him, it may be better that he engages all the FMs in this very thread. Wish someone requests him accordingly.
Why don't you consider replying to the posts made by FM @keith_correa who comes across (to me at least) as very knowledgeable in this regard?
Thanks. Hopefully i will get a chance to audition the speakers once i reach back bangalore since i am currently in my hometown due to the work-from-home situation.I do agree that flush mounting at least the tweeters, especially the domes with a large front baffle like the one used here is one of the very basic of norms in speaker designing today as it takes out of the equation certain problems with the short waves of high frequencies.
I also see that the woofer's bevel is a few mm raised with sharp edges which too can cause diffraction in the upper mids depending on the crossover point.
But again these are questions to be posted to the company and not the end user who is liking the music the speaker is producing.
Unless one listens to it personally taking into consideration the design imperfections as appears or prima facie, it would be a bit too harsh to make surmises.
@Vineethkumar01 as you live in the same city, you can possibly take an audition if interested in these speakers or even have a chat over phone with the designer to understand its design philosophies.
I have been wanting to listen to one of these speakers, but there appears to be no ownership in Chennai.