I had a similar discussion with US OPT designer and mfr Bud Purvine, who makes Onetics OPTs. I was contemplating 300B and 45 designs. He clearly said that each tube has different characteristics, and while 300B and 2A3 were similar( not identical), the 45 was a different animal and needed an OPT that was different. To know more about each, you need to spend time and read up a little more about them(like I did). I have a 45 SE(The Wavelength Audio Bugle design) which is very nice, and am now doing the Tom Christiansen, Neurochrome DG300B, which is almost completed-both have different OPTs best suited to each triode.
His observations are reproduced below:
The 300 B and 2A3 have very similar requirements and the 2A3 is far more flexible in it's needs than is the 300 B. The 4.545kZ impedance for the 300B provides you with the widest possible linear transform range. I have included an analysis of the 300B linearity, the measurements at the bottom are just a precision distance between the intersection points.The 45 tube is an odd duck here. Close to the same reflected impedance but about twice the inductance and half the current capability because the 45 is a medium Mu tube and the other two are low Mu tubes.
Each tube's OPT has different characteristics, the winding is different and the prices reflect this-the OPTs for 45s are about 10% more than the 300B or the 2A3 OPT.
Hope this helps you in your journey of understanding!