grubyhalo
New Member
Ah, OK. Oldie but goodie from what I've heard...
Is it going to be an audio streamer? What were your reasons for going for (I assume it's ordered by now --- unless you fell asleep over the mouse. :lol: (In which case you might wake up to find you've ordered 100)) the most expensive one?
I missed adding up the duty part but there is a good lottery chance it wont be taxed.
This is a PC, or if the customs cant understand that, then its a computer peripheral and they are rarely taxed, and if that, then in single digits. I think he will be fineI was taxed 30 percent on the Topping TP 20 :annoyed:
Did you order the Pro over the Ultra (USD20 difference) just for peace of mind or are there any other applications you're thinking of? I don't think a streaming box really needs a quad-core processor unless you're planning to enable transcoding or internet-streaming
Dont get me wrong, I'm always one for overkill and futureproofing, especially if the outlay is just 1000 bucks more :lol:I would agree with that, it is a bit overkill IMO. But I would love to get corrected if that makes subtle improvement in SQ.
Hi,
Who knows if tomorrow an audiophile quality opensource equalizer or dynamic room correction software will be published in the next few years... a few extra cores will help. Besides currently on my dual core setup MPD uses 4 threads. After many excruciating hours of listening compulsively over the last 6 months, I also found a correlation between seperation, noise floor and amount of cpu load - even with the cpu load at levels of a steady 7% versus the occasional 3%. The contention for cpu cores and resulting scheduling latencies, and electrical backplane noise are things I want to minimize. Currently I use a low latency kernel. On the cube I will use realtime. This week I will compile rt for my current pc as well.
~G0bble
Very interesting. Which RT kernel are you looking to use?
Equalisers are there aplenty. I use Calf plugins with their own stand-alone host. I haven't looked for Linux room correction software.Hi,
Who knows if tomorrow an audiophile quality opensource equalizer or dynamic room correction software will be published in the next few years...
.a few extra cores will help. Besides currently on my dual core setup MPD uses 4 threads. After many excruciating hours of listening compulsively over the last 6 months, I also found a correlation between seperation, noise floor and amount of cpu load - even with the cpu load at levels of a steady 7% versus when its only the occasional peak at 3%
Thanks to the work done by rnbc (I think you mentioned the IRQ balancing setup in another post somewhere) this should not be too much problem.The contention for cpu cores and resulting scheduling latencies, and electrical backplane noise are things I want to minimize.
Probably you want to do this as a satisfying technical exercise anyway, but it is really not necessary. I don't know about other distributions, but KXStudio comes with standard low-latency kernel. Bear in mind that studio users and music makers are driving their systems waaay beyond anything that us mere listeners are ever going to do.Currently I use a low latency kernel. On the cube I will use realtime. This week I will compile rt for my current pc as well.
Equalisers are there aplenty. I use Calf plugins with their own stand-alone host. I haven't looked for Linux room correction software.
I can lock my 3.2 Ghz, 4-core pc down to 0.8Ghz, and it is fine for playing music while using the resource-heavy firefox/thunderbird! It draws the line at HD Youtube video+sound, though: that just stalls. Can do it at the next step (on the CPU Freq applet) of 2.1 ghz, although, for that, I'd probably just lock to "performance" which fixes the cpu freq at max. I'd do that for any recording/editing work, too. Of course, I wouldn't be browsing whil doing that.