I was alluding to dispersion..Phase and timing issues will be present irrespective of whether the woofer is flush mounted, rear mounted (like in this case) or whatever because the acoustic center of the woofer is always going to be behind that of the tweeter unless it's a slanted baffle that takes care of this. It (acoustic center) needs to be accounted for in the crossover in any case.
I think it will be better for all drivers to be flush mounted to the front baffle ( and not any deeper ) in order to get better dispersion.
Aesthetics gets 2nd preference over sound unless the master orders otherwise..
However..In this situation you are the best judge...
Thanks Bro.Wow, looks awesome brother.
I am well aware of the phase and time alingment. I will try to coverup this issue in crossover.A really good job sir..
As others have mentioned rear baffle mounted drivers not only have aesthetic issue, but also phase and timing issues with tweeter (as the car tweeters would be mounted Front baffle), If the crossover has addressed, its great, but doubt due to the budget nature.
You can try what KEF does by seating the drivers in a counterbore and use a covering ring to close the gap.
eg.
(FYI, most expensive speakers are using cheap frames and just hide them)
All the best
For a woofer, not very relevant.I was alluding to dispersion..
The sound outupt is 200% WRT the bucks spent on them.Looks awesome, How does it sound?
Thank YouGood job done bro. Kudos to your endeavours.
Yes i have kept it intentionally.Is the binding post upside down @sadik ?
Looking GoodUpdate:
Just finished the Amplifier. I have used teak wood as a face plate, It turned out beautiful. I now just need to cover the face plate with a clear PU paint for protection. Since it is a budget friendly project i will be using Plastic knobs which are readily available in market. Also the Power on switch is fitted on back side of enclosure.View attachment 57237View attachment 57238View attachment 57239