Have heard this receiver, its not bad.
rgds
Does it mean it is not so good? Or not as good as pm 5004/6004?
I am surprised not a lot of them have this and/or have not seen this post to comment? Even I am looking to buy this one. I am planning to pair it with the Wharfedale 400. I will only listen to music so clarity and hi fidelity is must..Please advice !
No I am planning to by Stereo Receiver as it has many features like Radio etc. and its value for money, i dint know the sound quality that's why i decided to ask the form members, beside it has good wattage per channel also.
Any speaker which is close to 90db efficiency will do justice for Marantz SR4023..
Well I have a serious doubt here:
planning to upgrade to Marantz PM7004 but came accross this SR4023
which is less then half price of 7004...though both are for stereo setup.
I Just wanna know is it worth paying more than double...is the sound quality
is that folds better than 4023.
Pls ADVISE
Well I listen only to Vinyls on my technics Rcord-Deck with M44-7
speakers Polk tsi200 with sound sensitivity 90db.
Well I have a serious doubt here:
planning to upgrade to Marantz PM7004 but came accross this SR4023
which is less then half price of 7004...though both are for stereo setup.
I Just wanna know is it worth paying more than double...is the sound quality
is that folds better than 4023.
Pls ADVISE
QUOTE]
Both these amps use EI transformers. Probably SR 4023 may be having IC circuit. PM 7004 uses transistors. This is where the quality of the signal output and strength differs. 7004 has very good phono stage and is also having midrange adjustment. I advise you to hear to both simultaneously and you will judge them by yourself.