My ceiling height is 8.5' (drop ceiling with armstrong tiles - true ceiling height is 10'), I get a vertical soundstage of about 8', tweeters are about 36" from the ground. I have used - https://www.gikacoustics.com/product/gik-acoustics-gridfusor/-at the boundary of the wall/ceiling on the wall behind the speakers and it has made a tremendous difference to extend vertical soundstage."Meanwhile if you guys could roughly tell me the approximate soundstage height of your setup and ceiling height of your room,it will help me assess my situation accordingly".
Hi Sachin,The stand have spikes.@Shinto, since it’s difficult to make out from the pic, can you tell if your speaker stands have footers/spikes? Or are they resting flat on the floor with maximum contact?
Hi sidvee, Thanks a lot. now that gives me a perspective of your setups vertical soundstage and I can compare mine.so may I ask what would be the height of your singer in general with a vocal oriented track.is it above the speakers??My ceiling height is 8.5' (drop ceiling with armstrong tiles - true ceiling height is 10'), I get a vertical soundstage of about 8', tweeters are about 36" from the ground. I have used - https://www.gikacoustics.com/product/gik-acoustics-gridfusor/-at the boundary of the wall/ceiling on the wall behind the speakers and it has made a tremendous difference to extend vertical soundstage.
Cheers,
Sid
Yes definitely, I would say at-least 5-6' which is about 2-3' higher than the tweeter position - obviously it would vary from track to track depending upon the recording but that is the average position. I also used to run SHL5 in the same room with approx. same speaker position, but while the vertical stage never extended to 8' it was definitely 1-2' above the tweeters. Please note I did not have the gridfusors when I used the Harbeths.Hi sidvee, Thanks a lot. now that gives me a perspective of your setups vertical soundstage and I can compare mine.so may I ask what would be the height of your singer in general with a vocal oriented track.is it above the speakers??
Would you mind telling me your room dimensions and if you remember the,speaker placement distance from front wall, distance between speakers and distance to your listening position when you used to have the harbeth s.In my setup I have moved the recliners on the sides ,covered the tv with rugs,moved seating closer to speakers,raked back the speakers slightly as advised by our forum members.please see attached pic.the wooden chair is the listening position now which is 2.5 m from speakers.the speakers are 2 m apart.all these improved the focus.no difference in height.the height of the voice is around the height of the tweeter s .the centre image is locked and does not move as I move my head etc.this makes me think in this room I am not going to make much difference in height of stage with these minor steps unless the electronics or the speakers themselves are replaced .Yes definitely, I would say at-least 5-6' which is about 2-3' higher than the tweeter position - obviously it would vary from track to track depending upon the recording but that is the average position. I also used to run SHL5 in the same room with approx. same speaker position, but while the vertical stage never extended to 8' it was definitely 1-2' above the tweeters. Please note I did not have the gridfusors when I used the Harbeths.
Cheers,
Sid
Thanks Sid.My room dimensions are 14' x 12' x 8.5' with speakers on the shorter dimension. I don't remember exactly where the Shl5's were, but they were approx. 3.5 - 4' from the rear wall and approx. 2' from side wall. The stands put the supertweeter at my ear position. Here is a link to my audiogon page where the 1st photo is with the SHl5.
Cheers,Recent Upgrades | Virtual Listening Room
sidvee's listening room featuring Acoustic Revive SPC-PA, Acoustic Revive RCA 1.5M triple c interconnect, GIK acoustics, Echo buster Acoustic panels, Audio Art Power1classic, Shunyata Diamondback, Venom, Symphonic Line Kraft 250, Bricasti Design M1SE, Aurender N100H, Wilson Audio Sabrina, Luxman...systems.audiogon.com
Sid
Thanks TuffI get 5 feet high vocals after fiddling a lot with speaker placement. But changes in some songs drastically to 3 feet. But i have a line source and dipole, not the same soup.
I get 5 feet high vocals after fiddling a lot with speaker placement. But changes in some songs drastically to 3 feet. But i have a line source and dipole, not the same soup.
One sure shot way is to play a few videos of a performance with some standing and some sitting and performing. Now take a look at this image as an example. View attachment 44893
With Maggies the sound is allover, height around 6 ft above approx, but I cannot make out the upper part of the Vertical image because they're 4 ft speakers wall mounted 1 ft above the ground. With Focals at least 4 ft and LEDR movement can be easily made out.Meanwhile if you guys could roughly tell me the approximate soundstage height of your setup and ceiling height of your room,it will help me assess my situation accordingly
Hi Sushant,Hi. I use a harbeth c7es3 myself and the vertical height of the soundstage is on the speaker level to sometimes much below that. I have not noted it to come from say 6 or 8 feet.
I tried to find something on the harbeth forum after reading this post by Shinto who also uses a Harbeth speaker. Came across this interesting discussion where briefly Alan Shaw and Alan March (March audio Amplifiers) talk about sound staging and post mixing and how mics work when recording.
The discussion if you read page 4 and 5 is about Amplifiers and speakers and whether one or the whole chain is responsible for soundtsaging etc and might be slightly different to the issue at hand. A lot of technical jargon thrown in for my level of understanding. refer post no. 79 particularly. Also this by Alan Shaw,
"It is not possible to synthesise those attributes as a post-recording process, although if it were, then music could be recorded in any old cheap and cheerful acoustic space such as disused warehouses, hotel rooms, domestic living rooms and then miraculously post-processed into beautiful world-class acoustic recordings, saving a vast cost and inconvenience. There is no mechanism in any part of the reproduction chain to practically alter the perception of acoustic space hard coded into the recording except by manipulation of the loudness of certain octave bands, which would create a modified subjective illusion."
I am trying to make sense of this and trying to learn how room and speaker positioning and absorption/diffusion etc can help in altering the presentation to our liking so am following this thread to learn more.
The power amp is Quad 909 and the tube pre is Anode Acoustics. The distance from the back wall is 4 1/2 feet and side is 2 1/2 feet and the speakers are 5ft apart from each other. I sit about 7 feet away. I have tried shifting all these a bit here and there barring distance from side walls. I also roughly hear soundstage at about 3ft or so and some recordings it could be slightly more but just very slightly. The imaging and separation with most recordings is very good, so no problems there.Hi Sushant,
May I ask what electronics you have in your setup.Also what is the room dimension ,speaker width(apart) and distance to your listening position.Inmy setup the vocal are say at 2 to 3 feet, may be 4 feet sometimes ,Makes me think that this normal.Thanks for the Harbeth thread.
View attachment 44915Artaching a photo.
Hi Sachin@Sushant Sharma, are those pillows behind the speakers? In what ways has that helped with the sound?
Blast from the past
You should find something informative in this thread
How Do I Improve Image Height, Stereo (Engl.) - HIFI-FORUM
I am an \'image freak\' and a great sound stage is Very important to me, for my listning pleasure. My system is quite basic : Denon 2900 Universal Plwww.hifi-forum.de