@captrajesh
The twin towers seemed to be weapons targetting my eardrums!![/I]
:lol: gud1 :lol:
@captrajesh
The twin towers seemed to be weapons targetting my eardrums!![/I]
The blumenhofer cannot be termed as soft . Given the right music, it will blast the living daylights out of ya. Not a speaker for sissies !
Am I beginning to sound like a fanboy ??? :annoyed:
Hearing about blumenhofers for the first time (pardon my ignorance), I looked up these. Man, are they ugly! This is the worst looking speaker I have seen (in pictures that is) - the worst I have seen so far have been Wilson Audio speakers and this one beats it by a wide margin. I understand that we are talking music here. Still, a totally industrial looking equipment in the living room? I shudder.
On the practical side, would this not be too big in the room that the OP has (15x11)?
Hearing about blumenhofers for the first time (pardon my ignorance), I looked up these. Man, are they ugly! This is the worst looking speaker I have seen (in pictures that is) - the worst I have seen so far have been Wilson Audio speakers and this one beats it by a wide margin. I understand that we are talking music here. Still, a totally industrial looking equipment in the living room? I shudder.
On the practical side, would this not be too big in the room that the OP has (15x11)?
@captrajesh
Recently I had the experience of listening to a fairly expensive set up at someones place.The owner had spent a fair amount of time/money putting his system together.From the very first look/note I did not like what I was seeing and hearing.The overall sound was bright and abrasive.It lacked body and weight.The twin towers seemed to be weapons targetting my eardrums!After 10 minutes of shrill,screaming guitars and hammering drums I had heard ENOUGH and merely wanted to get away without seeming rude.Finally mumbled 'Pretty Good',before gently turning down the volume and changing the topic.The owner meanwhile waxed eloquent about how,thorough research and a great ear for music had enabled him to assemble a fantastic system!
I will definitely like to listen to Blumenhofers. I may get a chance this week end. But square_wave, will they not be a bit overkill for my small room? They are floor standers and has big enclosure compared to a BS. Also, can they be well driven by my Leben 15 WPC amp? As far as I know, the Genuine 4.2 has 90 db at 8 ohm sensitivity. I may not get these clarification even after listening to them in Jochen's place. His room is quite big compared to mine and he will drive it with Einstein hybrid amp with 60 WPC power. Any pointer?
I am intrigued square - what is the pricing?
Cheers
Sid
Would any one suggest about Odyssey Stratos Extreme Monoblock -BE 718 combo ( am not going in to speaker arguement ) . These Monoblocks are quite VFM to me ( with very limited knowledge) and heard that Odyssey Monoblocks performs much better . Forum member Ram is quite happy with Khartago Monoblock with Minidancer 1 ( though with shindo pre ) .
Regards
Hi
Just my 2 cents.As speaker sensitivity and solid bass is an issue and considering that the ayon/leben pedigree is stronger than the usher, the definitive technology mythos sts can be an option(hi sensitivity and internal amps for bass).The Wes Phillips stereophile review of sts refers to the cayin-sts sound and also the be718 and is quite favourable , so amit check it out .Dont bother for room size as my deftech bipolars have no issues in my 12x14 room.
cheers
himadri
Viren, Amit and Kamal were over a fortnight ago and we heard the Be718s (US crossover) driven by Bel Canto Ref1000 MkI (500 wpc @ 8ohms) monoblocks. My CD player has a volume control and is plugged directly into the Bel Canto. I like the sound but for CDs recorded at a low volume level I feel the need to turn up the CDP volume beyond 50%. We listened to this setup for while and then Viren added his tube preamp to the mix, and what a difference that made. The sound was fuller, bass tighter, and speakers sang. The Bel Canto has enough power, but it needed a preamp - the passive volume control on CDP is good for many CDs but not all.
Amit, I forgot to mention that day that I have a pair of Proac Response 1SC which we can try out with the same setup and compare with the 718s. Come over sometime and let's hear the difference.
Speaker sensitivity by itself is the wrong thing to look at. One needs to look at impedance curve and phase angle along the frequency curve. There will be frequencies at which the phase angle dips to negative on the y axis. These are the frequency spots which where an amplifier will struggle to deliver if it cannot supply increased current demand resulting from phase angle. For a valve amp you need a speaker driver that has a phase angle that is positive all along - because valve gear is voltage driven and they cannot supply the current demands required of such difficult loads. A solid state that can deliver the required current will perform better with drivers that have negative phase angles - Provided current limiting circuitry does not limit the draw.
Case in point - I jumped from 86db to 94db drivers. There is little difference in how the amp behaves - it still sounds its best only at 9O'Clock and above.
So if you want to find a speaker that will work well with a valve amp, check the phase angle information and impedance - if the manufacturer publishes those specs i.e.
HTH
Measurements specs can be misleading not only because of marketing hype, but also because manufacturers do those measurements in anechoic chambers where as the response in a 'normal' room would be completely different manner.Our listening room is an integral part of our music system which is why the final results good/bad are only revealed gradually after we have paid for everything:sad: