Yeah.. Let's see... There will be a bit of bias as you will put your hard earned money of the PA..
A double blind test with proper level matching will be the ultimate test.
There's no denying that a good amplifier brings the best out of a given speaker. But, how much better at what cost?? Is the question to be asked.
There are some cheaper speakers out there which really benefits from high quality, high power, expensive amplifiers like the Magnepans.. But, I feel most affordable and commonly known speakers benefit a very little to none from a quality PA in terms of SQ in Movies... But, as your goal is to get your system to be louder, there's no doubt you'll get that with XLS 1502..
Just sharing a snippet of Soundstage Hifi review of my new speakers that I'm going to buy something that has to do much with the Power Amplifier. NOTE : its a Critical STEREO Music review...;-)
Enjoy and post your personal experiences, My Friend... Eager to read your thoughts...
Dude, to theorize is fine. I get where you're coming from. Its rather fulfilling to shoot an arrow in the dark and have it land on the target. But do see if you can get some hands on experience. Which brings me to my next issue - its all well and good to follow reviews and reviewers and its a lot of fun. Its akin to experiencing gear vicariously through somebody else. Its good to be informed and there's plenty to lap up but don't take it as the gospel truth. I've been where you are at right now i.e. based on reviews and other stuff that i'd read up, i thought i had a pretty good handle on things. I'm possibly subscribed to every single hifi reviewer on youtube (
even the obscure ones) plus Whathifi magazine - both UK and India, Stereophile, Hi-Fi Choice, Hi Fi News, Sound & Vision, Home Cinema Choice, AV Max (
now defunct but i still enjoy flipping through its pages) and a lot of other websites that review audio gear.
You'll find opinions on both sides of an issue. Plus, not all reviewers are neutral and in fact, while in conversation with a very popular youtuber the other day, he cast some significant aspersions on some of them. I suppose the same applies to magazines as well.
But most importantly, not all ears are built equal. Some people i know are far more sensitive to the nuances in sound than me and are better capable of defining the effect of each equipment in my chain. In fact, whenever i'm auditioning gear, whether at home or at the store, i take along a friend or two as far as possible to confirm whether what i believe i'm hearing is in fact what i'm hearing. My point is, every person's mileage may vary which includes reviewers as well. For some people who are not blessed with the ears of a fox, even music driven through an AVR. In fact, I've seen people who are supremely satisfied with their JBL flip 3s and who see absolutely no point in getting themselves even a half decent stereo.
Which brings me to an anecdote - During this pandemic, we've regularly been doing Sunday brunch at this friend's place who happens to have a JBL Flip 3. During one such brunch, i'd toted along the combination of my Ipad+Chord Mojo+Crown XLS 1502+Bostons Acoustics A26. It sounded phenomenal in his space (
the acoustics in his living room were simply outstanding, something that is not the case with mine) and most people were blown away. I say 'most' because when i tried suggesting to this friend that he should get a stereo as well, he simply stated that he saw no requirement for the same as he did not prefer listening to his music loud. For him, the only difference in sound that my setup made was play the music louder. The entire gamut of attributes such as details, dynamics, stereo imaging, soundstage, transients etc. that the abovesaid setup brought to the table were lost on him. At that moment, was i supposed to tell him that he had the ears of a peasant?
It was a hard lesson for me that not everyone perceives sound in the same way and/or are adept at picking up and appreciating their nuances.