In the era of OLEDs, does it make any sense to buy LED TV?

[sachinchavan 15865]

There are people who spend more than a lakh on mobile phone every 2 years. 5 years seem to be good number for a TV imo. And yes it is a depreciating asset like a car. It all boils down to whether you are passionate about it or not. I have friends who have spent close to 15L on their audio system and spent 1L on their 65" TV.

My post was sharing my personal perspective and thoughts for my own future TV purchase. It’s not intended as a commentary on anyone else.

As for mobile vs TV, some like me would be ok spending more on a mobile than a TV as it provides us much more utility. When I upgrade my iPhone Pro Max eventually (most likely when Apple Intelligence gets launched in India), I shall look at the top of line iPhone at that time. While a TV is essentially for personal & family entertainment, a mobile is also a much more versatile tool with professional utility.

 

[DB1989]

I have just seen a Demo on OLED TV which I would like to share here. I have also seen it in my old LCD TV, but still the clarity is super, very much enjoyable. Imagine just how beautiful it would be if one watches it in real OLED TV

Video credit: Oled Demo

I'm watching it on both my LG G1 OLED and my Sony X9500G and the scenes with black or dark backgrounds look better on my OLED whereas the ones with bright highlights and very few dark spots/scenes look far better on the LED. It depends on the living situation (bright room) and the content being consumed. For now, OLEDs are more accurate at the cost of luminosity - it all depends on which metric or attribute any given person prefers.

Demos may be misleading in determining which one is a better fit for you.

To elucidate, check out this demo - it looks so lacklustre on my OLED but absolutely stunning on the LED. The problem lies with cheap LED panels which cannot muster enough luminisence or don't have adequate dimming zones

 

[Passive_audio_enthusiast]

There are people who spend more than a lakh on mobile phone every 2 years. 5 years seem to be good number for a TV imo. And yes it is a depreciating asset like a car. It all boils down to whether you are passionate about it or not. I have friends who have spent close to 15L on their audio system and spent 1L on their 65" TV.

5 years is a good number of years for any tech gadget in terms of reliability nowadays. Even if it survives this mark, we will feel it outdated already and with tvs the size standard and tech standards vs the price changes drastically in 5 years. I bought a 55 oled in 2017 and got the exact same amount I bought a 77 inch oled(old one was a B series and the new one a G Series) last month. Although it went past the 5 year mark I mentioned for me, after the 3-4 mark I felt it suddenly became outdated in terms of size. 65 became the new standard in between and seems like 77 and 83 are the new normal.

 

[sbg]

8 years completed last month (i.e could be 20000+ hrs when last checked )- lg 65" led. Still do not feel this is outdated yet.
The bonus is the protective film on bezel is still there like new .
Have seen OLEDs - it did not sway my mind to upgrade.

In my personal opinion, if the tv usage is very minimal, getting any led tv too should get the job done. It can grow on you over time and this would hardly make any difference later on.

 

[sbg]

8 years completed last month (i.e could be 20000+ hrs when last checked )- lg 65" led. Still do not feel this is outdated yet.
The bonus is the protective film on bezel is still there like new .
Have seen OLEDs - it did not sway my mind to upgrade.

In my personal opinion, if the tv usage is very minimal, getting any led tv too should get the job done. It can grow on you over time and this would hardly make any difference later on.

20153 hrs now.

 

[rpanand25]

This Diwali I was thinking of new TV and looked at both Samsung 65 inch QN 90D (Mini LED) and S90 D (QD OLED) side by side for about an hour. Surprisingly they were being offered at 1.4 L before hard bargaining. I didnot find the OLED to be radically better and in some scenarios the Mini LED was ahead even in normal scenes. No doubt OLED has its own advantages. As per recent news Samsung is going to outsource its mini Led panels from TCL etc and focus on Micro LEDs development and production. The picture quality gap with OLEDs may narrow down further with mini LEDs when they become commercially viable. Just like mini LEDS have caught up in the last couple of years, the micro LEDs may also may make it to home TVs in not so long future. At present LEDs in the Mini LEDs avatar have come a long way. My neighbour has a 15 years old Samsung LED TV which is still going strong and is fine for them. Maybe companies built better those days without focussing on dimished longevity. It depends on what is your requirement and how particular you are about picture quality.

 

[jbgude]

Anybody here having a 98"/100" model that can suggest a few options ? While I am using a LED 75 & an 65 OLED, and am perfectly happy with both the TVs picture quality, I got the bug to get a larger screen. Since I live abroad part of the year, I do not want to spend a huge amount on an OLED, all of which are currently above 15L
I have been given to understand that several 98/100" models are due foe launch, but no one seems to know just exactly when.
What is the opinion on TCL & Hisense ? The specs on both these Mini LED TVs seem good and are around the 4L range - the other viable option seems to be the Samsung Crystal model.