Sometime back I was looking to upgrade from my Plinius integrated. I was keen about the Accuphase line. I had heard their entry level E203 which had some magic to it but yes, resolution and bass control was left wanting. So when I wanted to upgrade from my Plinius I thought of looking at the higher end Accuphase and E450 vs 550 was something I wanted to know. At that time I had Dynaudio 1.3SE so I did not want to take risk with the 30 watter but I also got some interesting feedback then that E550 can sound amazing even if it is just about 30 watts. Finally I ended up buying a Symphonic Line RG1 Mk4. But my infatuation with Accuphase was yet there.
Aha another SL amp. Why Accuphase really? I think the SL has everything and more.
Incidently I too had the same Dyna speaker but at the time I had miserable electronics and did not realize the true caliber of the speaker. Sadly I sold it for a song and then jumped into the B&W 800 bandwagon.
The current E250 is the latest avatar of the entry level Accuphase. Its good but it does not sound like the 450 at all. I am not saying its a bad amp but that its not the accuphase sound that one is after and hence not worth the money. The 350 is decent but this 450 is creamier. Plus the flexibility to try putting an integrated on some tough loads rather than jump into the bulky current dumpers!
I loved the A 60 (never heard the new 65) but that was too much moolah for an amp for a 'rational' (relatively) minded bloke
Am sure ur set up sounds great Dr bass.
Rgds
Last edited: