Highly recommend you listen to the PSBs as well.
PSB dealer is Lakozy (Chowpatty) where you can get an audition as well.
Thanks Nikhil - Lakozy is very convenient. I work minutes from there. Which PSB's would you suggest?
Highly recommend you listen to the PSBs as well.
PSB dealer is Lakozy (Chowpatty) where you can get an audition as well.
in my opinion get a pair of wharfedale diamond 10.1 and throw in a sub later probably from wharf's stable eg-sw 150..to my ears i get an crispy pristine spacious presentation..probably my source is an 5star rated budget one!.my setup=marantz pm5003+cd 6004+wharf dia 10.1+wharf sw150(though i use it very rarely!)
Thanks Nikhil - Lakozy is very convenient. I work minutes from there. Which PSB's would you suggest?
The stand mounted monitor is bigger, is normally a 2 way and, well designed can easily rival a FS.
+1 from me as well
This is what my final realization was, and brought me back to stand mount monitors after trying out multiple floorstanders.
Monitors and speakers are one and the same thing.
Its just marketing lingo in action.
I would call this gross generalization based on incomplete data. Look at the following features of a monitor:
- Monitors were originally made for studios
- Monitors are mostly near-field - you have sit at a distance of about 4 feet.
- Monitors are supposed to reproduce the sound without any coloration - they have flat phase and frequencies responses.
- Monitors are meant to handle high volume of unmixed inputs. An artist will use a monitor to hear a particular voice or an instrument without it being confused with other artists' rendering.
- Monitors generally have unbalanced XLR inputs.
- Many monitors are active, though passive montiors are there.
- Monitors are built to be used rough and for extended periods - sometimes 10 hours a day.
You cannot use a studio monitor at home. You will end up with ear fatigue.
Cheers
I don't understand, how come if they were built for extended periods of use, why we end up with ear fatigue?
Either I am mixing up something or you are mixed up?
Ear fatigue comes from the way the monitors or speakers reproduce sound. I had specifically mentioned monitors have a flat phase and frequencies response. If you listen to Lata screeching for two hours, believe me, you will run out of the room. In studios, they take this sound (delivered by the monitors without an change) and tone it down for you to listen to regularly. In addition, speakers made for home do their own coloration of music in such as way that high frequencies are toned down, and mixed judiciously with other frequencies. Have you heard the concept of bright and warm speakers? It is the way the speakers mix the frequencies that they get their name from.
I wonder what this is supposed to mean?
Cheers
The statements you made contradict each other, if they were made for extended hours of play, why do we get ear fatigue? I am very much new to this, I understand a little bit about the bright and warm speakers but I think my understanding is not enough.
You are getting confused between time and sound quality. You can listen to a well balanced sound for a few hours. You cannot listen to a plane engine for more than a few minutes. Try playing a tone that has above 10,000Hz. You will not be able to stand it for more than a few minutes.
Cheers
I am trying to understand but, again you are contradicting yourself, if the sound coming out cannot be heard for more than few minutes how can you say they are built for extended hours?
What has the construction methodology of a monitor got to do with the audible capabilities of a human being? A monitor is built tough as it is used for extended periods in a studio pumping huge amplified sound. In a studio, the monitor may also be connected and reconnected many times, moved from one place to another, connected to different amplifiers.
When I say a monitor is ....
Cheers
Yo do realize that till 70s / 80s there was no real distinction between monitors and hi-fi speakers (Yams and JBLs). It just depended on who you are selling it to.I would call this gross generalization based on incomplete data. Look at the following features of a monitor:
- Monitors were originally made for studios
- Monitors are mostly near-field - you have sit at a distance of about 4 feet.
- Monitors are supposed to reproduce the sound without any coloration - they have flat phase and frequencies responses.
- Monitors are meant to handle high volume of unmixed inputs. An artist will use a monitor to hear a particular voice or an instrument without it being confused with other artists' rendering.
- Monitors generally have unbalanced XLR inputs.
- Many monitors are active, though passive montiors are there.
- Monitors are built to be used rough and for extended periods - sometimes 10 hours a day.
You cannot use a studio monitor at home. You will end up with ear fatigue.
Cheers
I would call this gross generalization based on incomplete data. Look at the following features of a monitor:
- Monitors were originally made for studios
- Monitors are mostly near-field - you have sit at a distance of about 4 feet.
- Monitors are supposed to reproduce the sound without any coloration - they have flat phase and frequencies responses.
- Monitors are meant to handle high volume of unmixed inputs. An artist will use a monitor to hear a particular voice or an instrument without it being confused with other artists' rendering.
- Monitors generally have unbalanced XLR inputs.
- Many monitors are active, though passive montiors are there.
- Monitors are built to be used rough and for extended periods - sometimes 10 hours a day.
You cannot use a studio monitor at home. You will end up with ear fatigue.
I referred only to hifi/home monitors, in the context of stand mounted speakers Vs bookshelves -I used the word monitor maybe in the way it is used in general parlance.
I dont want to start a flame on this thread so this is my last post on this thread.