Cosmos (1980, Carl Sagan) and Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey (2014, Neil deGrasse Tyson)
I am not really a science buff. When I started watching the original Cosmos, I had low expectations. The documentary series is very old and it was filmed at a time when CGI was in its infancy, there was no internet and featured a guy in a ship of the imagination that looked like a large office space with superman style controls. On top of that, this guy was talking about Pluto as a planet. But, as I kept watching, I was slowly drawn in.
Though technologically far behind (physical models and set pieces, actual presence in locations), Carl Sagan is an inspiring and authentic personality. The series aired on PBS and had one hour to go about its business. He was also a teacher who understood how to explain the ideas without sounding like a nerd speaking in a familiar, but jargon-ish alien language. His passion for science, his larger concerns about humanity shine through the series. If someone had taught me with half the passion the way he describes Kepler's laws, I might have taken a life-long interest in Science. I faintly remember the series airing in DD on Sundays (that's how I knew the word, Cosmos), but I was too young and didn't understand English at all.
I started watching the recent Cosmos series the same day I finished the original one. At first, I kept comparing it to the old series. Sure! I loved the great visual effects, the design of the new ship of the imagination, the music was not bad either (Alan Silvestri). Using Animation instead of hiring actors seemed like an OK idea as well. But, the really amazing technological transformation also brought forth the differences in generations. Compared to 60 minutes an episode, you had to condense the content into less than 45 mins (end title runs for 3 mins) and make it 'interesting' with a sort of a cliffhanger every time it goes into one of its umpteen breaks. It was a slightly jarring transformation, one that required me to rest for a couple of days to purge the memory of the old series.
Only after that, I started appreciating the new series for what it is. It tells new inspiring tales and takes full advantage of the animation and CGI, which the old one could not. There is more continuity than an overlap between them that one is better off watching both. They probably could not have found a better host than Neil deGrasse Tyson with his baritone voice. Using animation not made the production easier (as Seth McFarlane put it), but it got better and made more sense as the series progressed. However, with all the modernity and the grandness of the new one, I have a special fondness for the old series. Maybe Carl Sagan was not only transmitting the spirit of Science from across the screen, but some of his
Cannabis intake as well...
hyeah:
Ash vs Evil Dead
As one of the main culprits for damaging the VHS tapes of Evil Dead trilogy across all video rentals in an age as old as Ash, I was really looking forward to this series. Being the superfan that I am, I started early in the night and finished it early in the morning at one go. It is everything I expected it to be - silly, funny, blood, gore and Bruce Campbell just being himself (Just watch the
Comic Con video).
The Expanse (2015)
I wanted to watch this series because I came across
some articles about how it gets science
(mostly) right (
It still features sound in space, but then, without sound, a drama would feel really dead). I haven't watched any of the Sci-Fi series that matter, so it is really hard for me to judge how Expanse stands in the midst of them. But, it's an appreciable effort and since it's based on a book, the writing has generally been good (so far). For the first couple of episodes, I wasn't that interested, but it grew on me. I wouldn't say that I can't wait for the next season to roll in like I'd do with some series, but I feel that it is setup very nicely and would probably watch the next season when it airs. I only hope that SyFy does not run out of budget and stops it abruptly.
@Sam9S,
I am happy that you liked "Justified" as much as I did
. I like Boyd as much as Raylan. I loved the dialogues and the way the writers used cameos from minor, past characters from time to time.
I am looking forward to your comments about Deadwood (though it's more of an Al Swearengen show than Seth Bullock and demands slightly more patience at times).